Jeff Chiu/Associated Press/File
Researchers from MIT say that false news spreads more rapidly on Twitter than real news does — and they’re suggesting it might simply be because it’s more interesting.
“False news is more novel, and people are more likely to share novel information,” Sinan Aral, a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management and coauthor of a new paper detailing the findings, said in a statement from the university.
“People who share novel information are seen as being in the know,” even if the information turns out to be false, Aral said.
Falsehoods spread “significantly farther, faster, deeper, and more broadly than the truth, in all categories of information, and in many cases by an order of magnitude,” Aral said.
Deb Roy, an associate professor of media arts and sciences at the MIT Media Lab and director of the Media Lab’s Laboratory for Social Machines, who is also a coauthor of the study, said researchers were “somewhere between surprised and stunned” at the results.
The results were published Thursday in the journal Science.
The researchers said they found that the spread of false information was essentially not related to bots that are programmed to flood the Internet with inaccurate stories.
After removing the bots from their data, “the differences between the spread of false and true news stood,” said Soroush Vosoughi, a coauthor and postdoctoral researcher at the university.
The genesis of the research was the 2013 Boston Marathon bombings. Vosoughi said he followed Twitter for news during that tumultuous week and later realized that a good chunk of the things he had read were rumors. That insight ultimately led to the current study of false news.
The researchers consulted with six fact-checking organizations on whether stories were true or false. They tracked approximately 126,000 cascades, or unbroken retweet chains, of news stories on Twitter, accounting for a total of 4.5 million tweets by about 3 million people, from 2006 to 2017.
They found false news stories were 70 percent more likely to be retweeted than true stories. They also found it took true stories about six times longer to reach 1,500 people than false stories.
Researchers looked at people’s reactions to the stories and found people tended to respond to false news more with surprise and disgust, while they responded to true news more with sadness, anticipation, and trust.
The researchers said it is possible the same holds true on other social media platforms but said more study was needed.
Twitter users, Roy said, might reflect on this idea: “Think before you retweet.”
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev seemed so like me. But he was hiding more than I ever realized.Continue reading »
Alexandra Valoras showed every outward sign of success and promise, a star at school, beloved at home. She revealed nothing of her inner anguish, except in her diary — a chronicle of scathing self-criticism and growing desperation that her parents chose to share so that other families might learn from their loss.Continue reading »
The question might seem straightforward if you haven’t started looking into it, but there are enough wrinkles and curveballs to warrant careful consideration.Continue reading »
The Supreme Court nominee, who is facing a pair of sexual misconduct allegations, repeatedly denied during the Fox News segment having ever sexually assaulted anyone.Continue reading »
Doughnuts are still on the menu, but Dunkin’ Donuts is renaming itself Dunkin’ to reflect its increasing emphasis on coffee and other drinks.Continue reading »
Steve Horgan, whose “touchdown” salute in 2013 became an iconic moment in Boston sports, retires in January.Continue reading »
The 49ers QB was lost for the season with a torn ACL, robbing us of a chance to truly evaluate him.Continue reading »
A recent abundance of acorns is the reason for an unprecedented surge in squirrel populations throughout New England, most particularly in New Hampshire.Continue reading »