fb-pixel

President Trump on Friday described a nail-biting decision to call off an imminent attack on Iran, but the account was facing scrutiny from aides around him and military analysts questioning the sequence of events he laid out in tweets and statements.

Early in the day, the president said he called off the counterattack at the last minute because it would kill 150 people in retaliation for the downing of an unmanned surveillance drone. ‘‘We were cocked & loaded to retaliate last night on 3 different sights when I asked, how many will die,’’ he tweeted.

But administration officials said Trump was told earlier Thursday how many casualties could occur if a strike on Iran was carried out, and that he had given the green light to prepare for the operation Thursday morning.

Advertisement



The confusion reinforced concerns about the Trump administration’s credibility at a time when key US allies are already questioning its narrative about Iran’s culpability for a recent spate of attacks on oil tankers.

The decision has divided his top advisers, with senior Pentagon officials opposing the decision to strike and national security adviser John Bolton strongly supporting it.

Iran said Friday that the United States had ‘‘no justification’’ for a retaliatory strike and vowed to respond ‘‘firmly’’ to any US military action.

Trump’s Friday morning tweets appeared to gloss over the fact that he was the one, as commander in chief, who had ordered the retaliation against Iran in the first place.

Trump administration officials, who like others spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive national security decisions, said the president approved the strikes after Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps earlier in the day shot down the Navy RQ-4 Global Hawk, a move Trump described as a ‘‘very big mistake.’’

But he later changed his mind, the officials said.

Advertisement



The commander of the Revolutionary Guard’s aerospace division said Friday that Iran had sent ‘‘warnings’’ to the drone before shooting it down. In an interview with Iran’s state-controlled broadcaster, Brigadier General Amir Ali Hajizadeh said a final warning was sent at 3:55 a.m. local time Thursday.

‘‘When it did not redirect its route and continued flying toward and into our territory, we had to shoot it at 4:05 a.m.,’’ he said. ‘‘Our national security is a red line.’’

He said Iran refrained from also shooting down a US P-8 patrol aircraft, with 35 people on board, that he asserted had accompanied the drone into Iranian airspace. His claim could not immediately be verified.

A senior US defense official said Friday morning that the Pentagon had Navy assets poised to strike in Iran if directed, including ships accompanying the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln. Those attacks could have included airstrikes with jets, or — more likely — Tomahawk cruise missiles, the official said.

Trump’s initial tweets suggested that he had canceled his own order: ‘‘10 minutes before the strike I stopped it,’’ he said.

Later Friday, Trump offered a more detailed version of events, telling NBC’s Chuck Todd, host of “Meet the Press,” that he had not given a final go-ahead when military officials checked with him a half-hour before the strikes were scheduled to launch.

“So they came and they said, ‘Sir, we’re ready to go. We’d like a decision.’ I said, ‘I want to know something before you go. How many people will be killed, in this case Iranians?’ ” Trump told Todd. The president said that the officials said they needed to get back to him but eventually said that “approximately 150” Iranians might die.

Advertisement



Trump challenged reports that planes were already in the air when he called off the strike, adding: “I didn’t think, I didn’t think it was proportionate.”

In the NBC interview, the president said he hadn’t given final approval to any strikes. ‘‘Nothing was green lighted until the very end because things change,’’ Trump said in the interview.

In his Twitter posts Friday morning, Trump wrote that ‘‘sanctions are biting & more added last night.’’ However, the Treasury Department did not add any new sanctions against Iran on Thursday night.

There was also confusion about how the United States and Iran were communicating during the crisis at a time when the two adversaries have very few diplomatic contacts.

The Reuters news agency reported Friday that Iranian officials said they received a message from Trump through Oman overnight warning that a US attack was imminent.

When asked about the report, a senior US administration official said the United States never sent a message to Iran via the Omanis. The country at the eastern corner of the Arabian peninsula has long been an interlocutor between the West and Iran, but not on this occasion, the official said.

‘‘It is a complete lie and propaganda from Iran,’’ the official said.

Earlier Friday, the head of Iranian media services also told NBC News that the Reuters report was inaccurate. He said such a message from the United States was never sent and the content of the messages is also false.

Advertisement



The Federal Aviation Administration late Thursday barred US-registered aircraft from operating over the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman, due to an increase in military activities and political tensions that it said might ‘‘place commercial flights at risk.’’

Several US and international carriers said that they had either canceled flights over Iranian airspace or were taking steps to avoid the Strait of Hormuz.

The day’s events have left lawmakers in both parties confused about whether the United States remains on the precipice of a military conflict or if an imminent crisis had been averted.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Democrat of California, said Friday that she was not informed of Trump’s plans to strike Iran but described the latest events as a ‘‘dangerous, high-tension situation.’’

While Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky, expressed confidence in the president, several hawks in Congress said the only appropriate response would be a swift military counter-strike.

‘‘They’re trying to break our will and intimidate us to come to the negotiating table,’’ Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, said of the Iranians.

Representative Liz Cheney of Wyoming, the chairwoman of the Republican Conference and one of the top Republicans in the House, lashed out Friday at Trump’s decision, comparing his actions to former President Barack Obama’s public waffling over striking Syria over its chemical weapons attacks in 2013.

Advertisement



“The failure to respond to this kind of direct provocation that we’ve seen now from the Iranians, in particular over the last several weeks, could in fact be a very serious mistake,” Cheney told Hugh Hewitt, a conservative radio host.

Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, who is running for the Democratic presidential nomination, blasted Trump after The New York Times reported his decision to order strikes and then pulled back.

“Donald Trump promised to bring our troops home,” Warren wrote late Thursday night on Twitter. “There is no justification for further escalating this crisis — we need to step back from the brink of war.”

Trump’s comments on Thursday also left room for questions about how his administration planned to respond to Iran. Immediately following the drone’s downing, he tweeted that ‘‘Iran made a mistake.’’

But Trump said he found it ‘‘hard to believe’’ that the attack on the drone ‘‘was intentional’’ on the part of Iran’s top officials. He also noted that the aircraft was unmanned. ‘‘There was no man or woman in it,’’ he said. ‘‘It would have made a big difference’’ if a plane carrying people had been shot down. ‘‘It would have made a big, big difference.’’

The ambiguity Trump created, some argued, may now pose its own danger: Hard-liners in Iran could become emboldened to further test Trump. But at the same time he has raised expectations among some of his closest allies that he will let the missiles fly the next time.

“The risk of what Trump has done is that it conveys a confusing message to other parts of the world,” said Sir Peter Westmacott, a former British ambassador to Washington who was previously stationed as a diplomat in Iran. “Is he a blowhard? Is he secretly cautious — an Obama in wolf’s clothing? Or was new information brought to his attention that made him change his mind?”

Iran’s strike on the US drone Thursday followed a number of recent incidents, including attacks on tankers, that American officials have depicted as part of an Iranian effort to hurt the United States and its allies in the region. The United States has continued its ‘‘maximum pressure’’ campaign against a country the Trump administration has identified as its main adversary in the Middle East.

Tehran has responded with defiance to the campaign, which was launched after Trump withdrew the United States from the 2015 Iran nuclear deal and has included designating the Revolutionary Guard as a terrorist group and taking steps to cut off Iranian oil sales.

On Thursday, the European Union said officials from Germany, Britain, France, Russia, China, and Iran would meet next week to discuss strategies to salvage the nuclear pact despite renewed US sanctions and Tehran’s threat to exceed limits on its uranium stockpiles.

The done incident occurred the week after two tankers, one Japanese and one Norwegian, were attacked in the Gulf of Oman. The Trump administration has blamed Iran for both incidents.

The latest incident came just days before acting defense secretary Patrick Shanahan was due to step down. Shanahan, who this week withdrew from his confirmation process after news media, including The Washington Post, published reports about past family strife, is handing responsibility for the military to Mark Esper, who now serves as Army secretary.

Trump has previously authorized targeted strikes in the Middle East, including on government-controlled air bases in Syria. He was elected in 2016 promising to end American involvement in conflicts in the region.

At the same time, the Pentagon remains concerned about the potential for Iranian attacks on US military personnel, especially those stationed in Iraq. During a visit to Baghdad last month, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo sought to relay a message for Iranian leaders that even one American death would result in a US counterattack.

A US official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said US naval assets were trying to recover pieces of the drone.

The strike on the RQ-4 is much more significant than the recent attacks on Reapers. Each Global Hawk, which has a wingspan of 131 feet, is worth more than $100 million and is packed with sensors and able to fly at altitudes of more than 55,000 feet to observe broad areas for periods that can stretch longer than a day.

The Global Hawk downed on Thursday was an older ‘‘demonstrator’’ model, according to another U.S. official, that had been transferred from the Air Force to the Navy to carry out a mission known as Broad Area Maritime Surveillance. The Pentagon has since begun testing a newer cousin, the MQ-4C Triton. Neither version carries weapons.


Material from The New York Times was used in this report.