Senate OK’s spending plan that locks in $85b in cuts

WASHINGTON — The Senate approved legislation Wednesday to lock in $85 billion in broad federal spending cuts and simultaneously avoid a government shutdown next week — and pointedly rejected a call to even reopen White House tours that the Obama administration says had to be canceled because of the cuts.

If the House goes along, as expected, that means the across-the-board cuts set in motion by a failed earlier deficit-cutting effort and vigorously decried by President Obama last month, will remain in effect for the rest of the fiscal year through Aug. 31.

Some adjustments will be made. Federal meat inspectors were spared furloughs, for example, as lawmakers in both parties alternately clashed and cooperated over proposals to take the edge off the deficit-fighting cuts that took effect on March 1.


The administration — as well as Republicans skeptical of White House insistence that certain cuts were mandated — picked and chose its spots.

Get This Week in Politics in your inbox:
A weekly recap of the top political stories from The Globe, sent right to your email.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

‘‘My hope is that gets done,’’ Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said this week of the effort to prevent layoffs among inspectors that could disrupt the nation’s food supply chain. That was a departure from the administration’s general position that flexibility should ease all the cuts or none at all.

The overall measure passed 73 to 26. A final House sign-off is expected as early as Thursday, before lawmakers begin a two-week vacation. The legislation provides $982 billion for federal agencies to remain in operation through the end of the budget year, a level that takes into account the broad, deficit-fighting reductions that Congress passed and Obama signed into law more than a year ago.

Without changes, the $85 billion in cuts for the current year will swell to nearly $1 trillion over a decade, levels that lawmakers in both parties say are unsustainable politically. As a result, negotiations are possible later in the year to replace the reductions with different savings to restrain deficits.

Political considerations were on ample display in both houses as lawmakers labored over measures relating to spending priorities, both for this year and a decade into the future.


House Republican conservatives engineered a symbolic vote on a 10-year budget drafted by Senate Democrats that would raise taxes by $1 trillion and fail to eliminate deficits for more than two decades. It failed — as the GOP knew it would — on a vote of 154 to 261.

Representative Mark Mulvaney, Republican of South Carolina, said he had wanted the vote to occur on Obama’s budget, but he noted the president has not yet released one. “It’s with great regret . . . that I’m not able to offer’’ a presidential budget for a vote, he said. He added he had wanted to vote on a placeholder — ‘‘34 pages full of question marks’’ — but House rules prevented it.

Republicans are expected to approve their own budget blueprint on Thursday.

It calls for $4.6 trillion in spending cuts over a decade and no tax increases, a combination that projects a balanced budget in 10 years’ time. That spending plan would be simply a blueprint, lacking any actual control over federal spending.

The issues were grittier in the Senate, where lawmakers grappled with the immediate impact of across-the-board cuts on individual programs.


Senator Tom Coburn, Republican of Oklahoma, a deficit hawk, said he wanted to reopen the White House tours, shut down since earlier in the month. He said his proposal would take about $8 million from the National Heritage Partnership Program and apply it toward ‘‘opening up the tours at the White House, opening up Yellowstone National Park, and the rest of the national parks.’’

White House press secretary Jay Carney told reporters previously the decision the cancel the White House tours was made by the Secret Service.

But in remarks on the Senate floor, Coburn said, ‘‘This is a Park Service issue, not a Secret Service issue.’’

Senator Jack Reed, Democrat of Rhode Island, said the funds involved in Coburn’s amendment would not go to the Secret Service, and as a result the tours ‘‘would not be affected.’’

He also said the Heritage program, a public-private partnership, helps produce economic development and should not be cut.

The vote was 54 to 45 against the proposal. Senator Max Baucus of Montana, whose state borders on Yellowstone National Park, was the only Democrat to vote with Republicans.