Next Score View the next score

    WikiLeaks reveals intelligence firm’s e-mails

    Accuses US-based think tank Stratfor of shady dealings

    LONDON — The antisecrecy group WikiLeaks tried yesterday to shed light on the private intelligence firm Stratfor, saying it had more than 5 million of the company’s e-mails and would publish them in collaboration with two dozen international media organizations.

    The small selection so far published on the WikiLeaks website gives a look at the daily routine of the Texas-based security think tank, whose clients range from local universities to global megacorporations.

    One described a $6,000-a-month payment made to a Middle Eastern source, another carried bits of gossip dropped by a retired spy, and many were filled with off-color office banter.


    An initial examination of the e-mails turned up a mix of the innocuous and the embarrassing, but WikiLeaks chief Julian Assange promised more-explosive material in the coming weeks.

    Get Today's Headlines in your inbox:
    The day's top stories delivered every morning.
    Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

    “What we have discovered is a company that is a private intelligence Enron,’’ Assange told London’s Frontline Club, referring to the Texas energy company whose spectacular bankruptcy turned it into a byword for corporate malfeasance.

    Assange accused Stratfor of funneling money to informants through offshore tax havens, monitoring activist groups on behalf of big corporations, and making investments based on its secret intelligence.

    Stratfor denied there was anything improper in the way it dealt with its contacts.

    “Stratfor has worked to build good sources in many countries around the world, as any publisher of global geopolitical analysis would do,’’ the company said in a statement. “We have done so in a straightforward manner and we are committed to meeting the highest standards of professional conduct.’’


    The Stratfor statement suggested the company would not be commenting further on Assange’s allegations.

    “Having had our property stolen, we will not be victimized twice by submitting to questioning about them,’’ the statement said.

    It is unclear what impact the leak will have on the Austin-based Stratfor and its clients. The company client list includes investment firms, academic institutions, and major multinationals.

    How WikiLeaks got the company’s e-mails remains unclear. Assange refused to answer questions about the matter, but Stratfor said the messages appeared to be the same ones stolen by hackers in December. That breach, claimed by the Internet activist group Anonymous, ravaged the company’s servers and led to the disclosure of thousands of credit card numbers and other information.

    Wired magazine quoted an unnamed member of Anonymous as saying that the stolen data had been transferred to WikiLeaks, which allegedly acknowledged receiving the transfer using a coded message on Twitter. Anonymous appeared to confirm that account, pointing to the cryptic message “rats for donavon,’’ which WikiLeaks posted on Dec. 30.


    Several media groups, including Rolling Stone magazine and German broadcaster NDR, said they have been offered advance access to the e-mails and will publish stories based on the documents if appropriate.

    ‘What we have discovered is a company that is a private intelligence Enron.’

    Julian Assange Plaintiff

    One academic said the disclosures probably would scare away corporate clients.

    “When people discover, ‘Hey, here’s your clients,’ then your clients are chilled,’’ said Jeffrey Addicott, the director for the Center of Terrorism Law at St. Mary’s University in San Antonio. “It causes a certain uproar.’’

    Some clients are already facing questions. Among the e-mails are reports apparently compiled for the Dow Chemical Co. on activists who have targeted the company over its links to the Bhopal gas leak disaster, which killed thousands of Indians and spawned a long-running legal battle.

    Dow said in a written statement that “major companies are often required to take appropriate action to protect their people and safeguard their facilities,’’ adding that it operated within the law.

    The reports prepared for Dow appeared to be little more than roundups of news stories and Internet chatter, but Stratfor also boasts of more serious sources.