DAMASCUS — A proposal by a Syrian opposition leader for peace talks suffered two sharp blows Tuesday, with a ruling party lawmaker and the largest bloc inside the antiregime coalition rejecting the idea.
After 22 months and more than 60,000 dead, Syria’s crisis appears to have reached a stalemate, with neither side making significant battlefield gains likely to bring about a military victory anytime soon.
The United States and other world powers have pushed for a negotiated solution — a bid that appeared to get a boost this week when the head of the opposition’s National Alliance said he would be willing to negotiate with certain figures from President Bashar Assad’s regime ‘‘who don’t have blood on their hands.’’
In an interview with Al-Arabiya TV on Monday, Mouaz al-Khatib said the regime must ‘‘negotiate with the goal of removing [Assad] from power to spare bloodshed.’’ Khatib demanded the regime free 160,000 political prisoners and renew the passports of Syrian activists abroad.
That proposal was attacked from both the regime and the opposition on Tuesday, effectively extinguishing the first glimmer of hope in months that the civil war can be resolved through a negotiated solution.
In Damascus, prominent Syrian Parliamentarian Fayez Sayegh said that any dialogue must begin without preconditions. He also called Khatib’s number of opposition supporters in Syrian custody ‘‘exaggerated,’’ although he did not give an alternate number.
‘‘What is important is for Syrians to meet and agree on common ground for talks,’’ Sayegh said, adding that Khatib’s proposals, such as the prisoner release, should come ‘‘as a result of a dialogue, not before it begins.’’
Human rights organizations say tens of thousands of opposition leaders, protesters, and their families are being held by state security services in Syria.
Late Tuesday, the Syrian National Council, whose members make up a majority in the opposition coalition, blasted Khatib, calling his proposal an ‘‘individual decision’’ that had not been discussed or decided upon by the coalition. It said the coalition’s founding document states that its goal is to ‘‘topple the regime and all of its symbols and pillars’’ and said such moves weaken the opposition.
Khatib first suggested the possibility of dialogue last week in a post on his Facebook page, sparking a wave of criticism from activists and members of his own group who say the regime has killed too many people to play a role in the conflict’s solution.
Many accused Khatib of acting unilaterally, and he clarified in a subsequent post that he was expressing his personal views.
He explained his position further Monday, preconditioning the talks on Assad’s departure and saying they could spare Syrians more suffering.
‘‘The regime either has to admit that it has pushed the country to a scary state of complications and destruction and now feels this and negotiates to achieve the removal [of Assad] with the least losses or it takes another position,’’ Khatib told Al-Arabiya television. ‘‘All the others issues are less important than this.’’
He also suggested that there are regime officials the opposition would agree to meet with, mentioning by name one of Syria’s two vice presidents, Farouk al-Sharaa.