Next Score View the next score

    Despite new arms deal, US-Israel rift seen

    Disagree on where to draw line on Iran

    Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel (right) and his counterpart Moshe Yaalon, Israel’s minister of defense, spoke during a helicopter tour of the Golan Heights Monday.
    Ariel Harmoni/MOD via Getty Images
    Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel (right) and his counterpart Moshe Yaalon, Israel’s minister of defense, spoke during a helicopter tour of the Golan Heights Monday.

    TEL AVIV — US and Israeli defense officials welcomed a new arms sale agreement Monday as a major step toward increasing Israel’s military strength, but Israeli officials said it still left them without the weapons they would need if they decided to attack Iran’s deepest and best-protected nuclear sites.

    The mixed message came as Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and his Israeli counterpart, Moshe Yaalon, reaffirmed their commitment to stopping Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, while sidestepping a growing divide between the two countries about how close to allow Iran to get toward such a goal.

    In public, Hagel again said that Israel had the right to decide by itself how to defend the country, and both officials said military action should be a last resort. But a close adviser to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Monday that ‘‘the fundamental difference of views on how much risk we can take with Iran is reemerging.’’


    The new weapons sale package includes aircraft for midair refueling and missiles that can cripple an adversary’s air defense system. Both would be critical for Israel if it were to decide on a unilateral attack on Iran.

    Get Today's Headlines in your inbox:
    The day's top stories delivered every morning.
    Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

    But what the Israelis wanted most was a weapons system that is missing from the package: a giant bunker-busting bomb designed to penetrate earth and reinforced concrete to destroy deeply buried sites. According to US and Israeli analysts, it is the only weapon that would have a chance of destroying the Iranian nuclear fuel enrichment center at Fordow, which is buried more than 200 feet under a mountain outside the holy city of Qum.

    The weapon, called a Massive Ordnance Penetrator, weighs about 30,000 pounds — so much that Israel does not have any aircraft capable of carrying it. To do so, they would need a B-2 bomber, the stealth aircraft that the United States flew nonstop recently from Missouri to the Korean Peninsula to underscore to North Korea that it could reach their nuclear sites.

    The Obama administration has been reluctant to even discuss selling such capability to the Israelis.

    Iran has consistently denied that it wants nuclear weapons and has called its uranium enrichment activities peaceful.


    The Fordow site has become an increasing source of concern to the Israelis. When they referred last year to Iran entering a ‘‘zone of immunity,’’ Israeli officials said the phrase referred to the moment when the facility would be complete and immune from attack by Israeli forces. All the centrifuges that enrich uranium at the site have since been installed, but only about a quarter of them are operating.

    Israel has asked the United States for weapons like the Massive Ordnance Penetrator in the past and has been turned down. US officials declined to say whether the yearlong negotiations with Israel that resulted in the new arms package had included a discussion of the bomb. Instead, they pointed to a decision by President Obama to send advanced refueling tanker planes to Israel that would make it possible for the country’s fighter aircraft to reach as far as Iran. A similar refueling capability was turned down during the administration of former President George W. Bush.