fb-pixel Skip to main content
DANTE RAMOS

Outside brains keep late-night transit hopes alive

Late-night riders waited for a Green Line train in 2015.
Late-night riders waited for a Green Line train in 2015.Kieran Kesner for The Boston Globe/File

If Ari Ofsevit and Jeremy Mendelson have anything to say, the MBTA’s recent decision to kill off its late-night weekend service won’t be the final word.

Ofsevit, 31, is a planner for a private organization that runs bus shuttles. Mendelson, 30, cofounded the advocacy group TransitMatters. They’ve joined forces with former state transportation secretary Jim Aloisi to promote a bold idea: Instead of cutting back on weekends, the T should offer overnight bus service seven days a week.

In CommonWealth Magazine last week, Ofsevit, Mendelson, and Aloisi offered a clever plan for “a new, robust ‘All-Nighter’ service” on a limited bus network, at a cost of about $1 million a year. Their proposal, they write, “would enable the MBTA to set a standard for quality 24/7 service — service which is provided in Philadelphia, Seattle, Cleveland, and Baltimore, not to mention peer cities such as New York, Chicago, and San Francisco.”

The plan offers a credible solution to a nagging problem for the T: its inability to serve people with places to go between about 1 a.m. and 5 a.m. Beyond that, it also speaks to the benefits of tapping Greater Boston’s vast store of independent transportation brainpower — people in academia, the nonprofit world, or the private sector who identify problems and solutions that might otherwise escape official notice.

Advertisement



As the state ponders a new Mass. Pike interchange in Allston, Ofsevit and the group A Better City have proposed intriguing alternatives to the elevated viaduct state that highway planners put forth. Likewise, the late-night bus plan shows a similar mix of imagination and technical expertise.

Eight or so routes would radiate outward from a single central location, such as Copley Square. Once an hour, a bus from each route would meet back at Copley so that passengers who needed to transfer from one route to another could do so. The simultaneous layover — known as a “pulse” — would allow the T to serve an entire region with fewer than a dozen buses a night.

Advertisement



In hospitality and other industries, many workers have inconvenient hours, and not all of them can afford a taxi or Uber ride home. When the T added extra hours of service in 2014, low-income riders and minority communities especially benefited. Under federal civil rights guidelines, the T needs to figure out how to soften the blow of cutting that service.

Nothing that the agency has proposed would achieve as much as the all-night network that Ofsevit, Mendelson, and Aloisi favor. They’d build on a smattering of well-used but minimally publicized early-morning routes that the T already operates, originally as a way to get its own employees to work. By focusing on the needs of commuters, the new plan also counters the “drunk college kids” critique of late-night transit — the false but all-too-common notion that overnight service only helps rowdy partiers who are unworthy of public largess.

In an earlier era, outside experts might have presented ideas to transit agencies without getting a response; today they can flesh their ideas out online and tweet them at an agency like the T, which now has an implicit responsibility to respond to the best ones.

Advertisement



The T appears willing to hear all-night bus proponents out. “We’re very, very open to considering this,” says Monica Tibbits-Nutt, a member of the T’s Fiscal Management and Control Board who herself is a transportation planner.

Any test of the all-night proposal, she says, would need to have clear benchmarks, something the most recent late-night service program lacked. Another cautionary note comes from Massport CEO Thomas Glynn, who praises the technical sophistication of the plan but says a thorough demand analysis is in order. He notes that his agency, a major early-morning employer, already runs some shuttles for employees who need to get to work before the T starts up.

Still, the evident interest in the “All-Nighter” proposal could defy an unfortunate trend in public policy: Once an idea like late-night transit is deemed — even unjustly — to have failed, it won’t be tried again for years.

Particularly in a city that abounds with transportation knowhow, the limited options for late night transportation represent a conspicuous gap. The people in charge need to listen to bright ideas about how to fill it.


Dante Ramos can be reached at dante.ramos@globe.com. Follow him on Facebook: facebook.com/danteramos or on Twitter: @danteramos.

Editor’s note: After an earlier production error, this column has been updated.