New York Times/File 2012
Damn, we’re good .
As Boston pitches itself as the site for a new Amazon headquarters, it’s reclaiming its historically healthy ego. Yes, the hub of the universe has what it always had: super-smart people, great universities, and a high quality of life — for white Bostonians.
That’s the non-sanitized truth. This fabulous metropolis is not so fabulous for blacks and Hispanics — a persistent reality driven home by the latest NAACP report card. Detailing a deep and systemic inequality in public safety, education, income, employment opportunity, and economic development, the NAACP analysis gives Boston’s mayor, Martin J. Walsh, harsh grades for his failure to deliver on campaign promises to communities of color. Via statement, the mayor said, “We respectfully disagree with the grades given.” The Walsh administration also disputes some of the data used to measure housing stock and income.
Walsh got F’s for the lack of diversity in the Boston Fire Department; the recruitment and retention of teachers of color; and the city’s inability to fully implement the police body camera initiative. He got a D overall on economic development, a C-minus on public education, a D on public safety, and a C on overall staffing diversity.
The NAACP findings probably won’t bother Amazon, as long as it can find the educated workers it needs, along with housing and transportation to support them. But they should bother Boston. There’s a real disconnect between the picture painted in the NAACP report and the Boston described in its 218-page proposal to Amazon.
Yet the NAACP’s dissatisfaction with Walsh’s performance is not reflected by the current state of a mayoral race that barely registers as a competition. Walsh leads his challenger, Councilor Tito Jackson — the first black mayoral candidate to make the final ballot in 34 years — by 35 points.
Walsh is accountable for his promises, but there is or should be collective responsibility along all corridors of power. As City Councilor Ayanna Pressley put it, when asked about the report during a meeting Monday with the Globe editorial board, “I’m going to give Boston and its outcome for equity and wealth building . . . I give the city a C. I don’t lay that at the feet of one person.”
The NAACP report acknowledges Boston as a “shining city on a hill,” boasting prestigious academic institutions, world-renowned hospitals, and a new, expanding skyline. “However equity, access, and opportunity have historically — and presently — remained elusive for the city’s people of color. The taint of racial injustice in community development, education, employment, health, housing, politics and public safety has ensured that this rising tide is not lifting all boats,” it states. Also from the report:
Boston’s white residents have a median annual income of $51,000; Asians, $36,000; blacks, $29,000; Hispanics, $21,300.
Ownership of the city’s businesses (32 percent minority owned) is less diverse than the city’s population (53 percent minority).
Black and Hispanic unemployment rates are more than double those of whites. Unemployment for white people is 4.9 percent; 10.7 percent for black people; 10.9 percent for Hispanic people.
The consistent 30 percent achievement gap in academic performance for black and Latino students when compared with their white and Asian counterparts “has not moved under the Walsh administration.”
Nearly 200 years ago, a leading Bostonian named William Tudor described this town as “perhaps the most perfect and certainly the best-regulated democracy that ever existed. There is something so impossible in the immortal fame of Athens, that the very name makes everything modern shrink from comparison; but since the days of that glorious city I know of none that has approached so near in some points, distant as it may still be from that illustrious model.”
With that observation, Tudor is credited for designating Boston as the “Athens of America”
That’s the Boston being sold to Jeff Bezos. The other Boston is still in search of its champion.
What could be more typical of democratic politics than lobbying elected officials, or working to defeat them if you disapprove of their performance in office?Continue reading »
Now he looks even more like a mini-Trump.Continue reading »
A central pillar of President Trump’s politics is a sustained assault on the free press. Journalists are not classified as fellow Americans, but rather “the enemy of the people.”Continue reading »
The Constitution’s framers thought life tenure would ensure judicial independence, but they didn’t foresee how powerful the court would become.Continue reading »
President Trump may be giving aid and comfort to an enemy.Continue reading »
President Trump can claim some success on the economy, but nowhere near as much as he wants.Continue reading »
Who, really, do they think they are fooling?Continue reading »
Financial history has not ended, any more than political history ended with the fall of the Berlin Wall.Continue reading »
A law mandating a minimum number of slots for women on corporate boards sends an unfair and untrue message.Continue reading »