Opinion
    Next Score View the next score

    Michael A. Cohen

    With a hack atop Justice, Trump may get his wish

    FILE - In this April 24, 2014, file photo, then-Iowa Republican senatorial candidate and former U.S. Attorney Matt Whitaker watches before a live televised debate in Johnston, Iowa. President Donald Trump announced in a tweet that he was naming Whitaker, as acting attorney general, after Attorney General Jeff Sessions was pushed out Nov. 7, 2018, as the country's chief law enforcement officer after enduring more than a year of blistering and personal attacks from Trump over his recusal from the Russia investigation. (AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall, File)
    AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall/File
    Acting US Attorney General Matt Whitaker, pictured on April 24, 2014, during a senatorial debate in Johnston, Iowa.

    Here’s how strange things have gotten in Donald Trump’s America: On Wednesday, Attorney General Jeff Sessions was fired. On Thursday, liberals were out in the streets, in cities across America, protesting his dismissal.

    Generally speaking, Sessions is not the most popular figure among the resistance. He came to the Justice Department after a career defined by race-baiting and immigrant-bashing. In two years on the job, he continued down that path in seeking to make American justice cruel again.

    But the outcry over Sessions’ dismissal is not about him, but rather the trepidation that with his departure President Trump is seeking to shut down Robert Mueller’s special counsel investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election. With the ascendancy of Matthew Whitaker — Sessions’s former chief of staff and a partisan political operative — to the top job at the Department of Justice, those fears are genuine.

    Advertisement

    Ever since Sessions’ decided in early 2017 to recuse himself from the Russia investigation, the president insulted, humiliated, and railed against his then attorney general. If he had known of Sessions’ plans for recusal, Trump has publicly stated, he never would have named him to the post. In effect, Trump was complaining that his attorney general had refused to obstruct justice on the president’s behalf.

    Get Today in Opinion in your inbox:
    Globe Opinion's must-reads, delivered to you every Sunday-Friday.
    Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

    With Whitaker now on the job, Trump may get his wish.

    Whitaker’s background suggests he is not remotely qualified for the job he now holds. His resume includes a short stint as a US attorney and as a failed Senate candidate in Iowa. He served on the advisory board of a patent company that was successfully sued by the Federal Trade Commission for misleading investors and forced to shut down. Later, he became a cable news talking head in what turned out to be a successful effort to catch Trump’s eye and get a job in his administration. A notable legal thinker Whitaker is not.

    His unique legal opinions include a belief that courts “are supposed to be the inferior branch” of government and that judges with a “secular world view” shouldn’t be members of the judiciary.

    More troubling, however, are his views on the Russia investigation. He has said that there is “no evidence” of collusion by the Trump campaign and has accused Mueller of getting “dangerously close to crossing” a line when it was reported that the special counsel was looking into the president’s personal finances. Whitaker even managed the campaign of a witness in Mueller’s inquiry, former Trump campaign official Sam Clovis. Just one of these conflicts would be reason for Whitaker to recuse himself from supervising Mueller’s investigation. Instead, he appears to be taking over control of it from Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein (who should have taken over for Sessions).

    Advertisement

    Someone with this record — and these extraordinary conflicts of interest — would face a difficult path to Senate confirmation. That is probably why Trump did not nominate Whitaker to be attorney general, but rather made him, on an acting basis, the most powerful law enforcement official in America.

    Trump’s actions represent a brazen effort to circumvent the Senate’s constitutionally mandated advice-and-consent role — and place a political crony in a position to provide him the protection that Sessions would not.

    It is yet one more salvo from this president on the independence of the Justice Department and the rule of law. Lest we forget, he fired former FBI Director James Comey and openly admitted that he did so in order to block the Russia investigation. He’s publicly attacked Mueller and members of the FBI investigating him and his campaign and even directly criticized Sessions for indicting a Republican member of Congress before a midterm election.

    But last week’s developments might be the most alarming of all. Trump is attempting to turn the Department of Justice into a political arm of the White House and, in the process, use political loyalists to openly impede a criminal investigation that touches on his own conduct.

    When you think about it, the surprising thing is not that liberals are in the streets protesting, it’s that all Americans aren’t joining them. This is banana republic territory. And if Trump succeeds in this gambit, the rule of law in America will be on life support.

    Michael A. Cohen’s column appears regularly in the Globe. Follow him on Twitter @speechboy71.