letters | examining a gift at MIT

Charity is preferable to ever-expanding government

In “The two David Kochs” (Op-ed, Oct. 10) Joan Vennochi criticizes Koch for supporting charitable causes while opposing government programs aimed at the same population, implying some kind of personality disorder. Progressive thought has long believed that government’s role is to fill all unmet needs, and that charity is a temporary expedient until the ever-expanding government has caught up.

In Vennochi’s case, this strain of thought is evidently so strong that she can’t conceive of any reason other than “extreme cognitive dissonance” why someone would hold any other view. But surely one does not have to be schizophrenic to support, say, Habitat for Humanity while thinking the government should not be called upon to build everyone a house.

Andrew E. Gruber


Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com