letters | tax reform on the table

Poor could bear brunt of proposed changes

I enjoy John E. Sununu’s metaphor for the nerve to tackle tax reform — skiing down Tuckerman Ravine (“Tax reform: Ski it if you dare,” Op-ed, March 3). I also applaud Representative David Camp for putting specific proposals on the table. As an experienced tax preparer, I support simplicity. However, Camp proposes to add even more phase-outs and limits to tax savings, the most complex elements of the tax code. If one accepts that reductions in benefits are the same as a tax, then his proposal is worrisome.

Poor people pay much higher marginal rates than the rich once benefit caps and phase-outs are considered. Caps and phase-outs create nearly insurmountable barriers to upward mobility. I am a so-called compassionate conservative, but I do not want to see the social safety net frayed.


I’d like to see personal exemptions and the standard deduction replaced with $4,368 of food stamps for each citizen. In the 10 percent tax bracket, that’s equivalent to a $43,680 deduction, and in the 40 percent bracket, a $10,920 deduction.

A so-called citizens’ dividend, combined with a flat tax, would be progressive, simple to administer, reward work, and protect the unlucky. Now that’s a pro-growth tax code.

William E. Carlson


Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com