In the Aug. 11 editorial “For DAs in parole cases, hard line isn’t always best,” the Globe implied that when district attorneys oppose parole for a juvenile murderer, they are somehow taking the low road. Speaking for the victims and their families, as is my duty, that implication is wrong.
District attorneys understand that juveniles are different. Our diversion program offers first-time, nonviolent juvenile and youthful offenders a court alternative. The guiding principle of this successful program is that kids make mistakes. The program gives them a chance to learn from these mistakes without giving them a court record.
First-degree murder is different. It is permanent and traumatizes the families of victims forever. First-degree murder is a heinous act that violates our social contract in a fundamental way. The action of intentionally or cruelly taking another person’s life should permanently deprive a person of his or her right to liberty.
First-degree murder also inflicts harm on the community. The idea that a person living among us and attending school with our children has committed such an act shakes our sense of safety and security to its core.
So when district attorneys support or oppose parole, they are neither taking the high road nor the low road. They have considered the facts, have taken the time to talk with the family of the victim, have reviewed the court and prison records of the murderer, and have considered how the murderer’s release could affect the community.
In short, they are doing their job.
VAWA saves lives, and its reauthorization is a vote for humanity over petty partisan politics.Continue reading »
Considering the substantial evidence that President Trump has committed high crimes and misdemeanors, why aren’t we talking about impeachment proceedings in Congress?Continue reading »
It’s not enough for the media to stand by itself to defend and protect press rights. It needs the support of other powerful institutions.Continue reading »
Nothing lit a fire like the federal government’s threat to all-white schools.Continue reading »
The historic concerns about hydropower are understandable. But it’s time to get everyone to yes.Continue reading »
The Trump administration’s “public charge” rule is chilling and cruel, and letters from Massachusetts officials show how the policy would hurt immigrants.Continue reading »
Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen may be the face of the manufactured humanitarian disaster, but Miller is the brains.Continue reading »
One of the first steps to combating hate incidents will be for the government to get a better handle on when, where, and to whom the are occurring.Continue reading »
The Supreme Court case of a Colorado cake maker will pit free speech against civil rights.Continue reading »