Boston Globe File Photo
The Legislature’s decision last year to allow the MBTA to contract out services paid off big time on Monday, when the state and the T’s biggest union reached a deal that probably would have been impossible without those reforms. Decisions by Governor Charlie Baker, state House Speaker Robert DeLeo, and Senate President Stan Rosenberg, directly resulted in savings for taxpayers that should allow the region’s buses and subways to operate more efficiently.
Just imagine what might happen if other agencies had the same latitude Beacon Hill so wisely gave the T.
In a four-year deal with Carmen’s Union Local 589, the state estimates it will save about $81 million that can be reinvested in the system. It gets there by curbing overtime, postponing a scheduled raise, and starting new drivers at lower wages. The T will also adopt an electronic scheduling system, replacing the paper system now in use. In exchange, the T promised not to outsource most jobs at the agency.
That powerful piece of negotiating leverage didn’t exist before, because the state’s so-called Pacheco law made it extremely difficult for state agencies to outsource work. But after the T’s disastrous performance in the winter of 2014-15, the Legislature, at Baker’s urging, gave the agency a three-year exemption from the rule in the same legislation setting up the T’s new oversight board.
Since then, the agency has made modest use of its outsourcing authority, moving to outsource its cash-counting operations and warehouse. The bigger impact, though, has been restoring the balance around the labor negotiating table.
“The issue of the MBTA was not privatization as an ideological matter, but productivity,” Transportation Secretary Stephanie Pollack said. “We needed to have productivity, either from our workers or the private sector.” According to the state, some of the T’s work rules had been in place since 1913.
The union comes out with raises and job security guarantees, which should put to rest the notion that the T was pursuing privatization at all costs. The union could have avoided talks — the old contract isn’t up yet — but, with the looming threat of outsourcing, chose not to.
The successful negotiation should raise a question: Why go back to the old system? The T’s Pacheco exemption expires in less than two years, but the Legislature could choose to extend it. By tying management’s hands so tightly, the Pacheco law practically invites waste. Privatization is not a panacea — and the T has been appropriately judicious about using it — but leaving the possibility on the table gives officials the leverage to get a better deal for the public.
The US is getting the choice between war and peace profoundly wrong, squandering vast sums of money and undermining national security.Continue reading »
Are they really watching as much porn as media stories claim?Continue reading »
Teaching techniques at colleges and universities have continued to evolve at a glacial pace.Continue reading »
In this divisive time, Trump’s myopic and soulless view of America has the floor.Continue reading »
Is Joseph Kennedy III the Democrat who can win the future? Or do these times call for someone edgier?Continue reading »
The movie falsely romanticizes an exploitative relationship between a grown man and a teenager.Continue reading »
How we talk about this group of militants is central to defeating them.Continue reading »
The proposed law would allow a judge to order the temporary removal of guns from someone ruled a danger to themselves or others.Continue reading »
America’s future is now up for grabs. We need clear answers to six big questions.Continue reading »