Boston Globe File Photo
The Legislature’s decision last year to allow the MBTA to contract out services paid off big time on Monday, when the state and the T’s biggest union reached a deal that probably would have been impossible without those reforms. Decisions by Governor Charlie Baker, state House Speaker Robert DeLeo, and Senate President Stan Rosenberg, directly resulted in savings for taxpayers that should allow the region’s buses and subways to operate more efficiently.
Just imagine what might happen if other agencies had the same latitude Beacon Hill so wisely gave the T.
In a four-year deal with Carmen’s Union Local 589, the state estimates it will save about $81 million that can be reinvested in the system. It gets there by curbing overtime, postponing a scheduled raise, and starting new drivers at lower wages. The T will also adopt an electronic scheduling system, replacing the paper system now in use. In exchange, the T promised not to outsource most jobs at the agency.
That powerful piece of negotiating leverage didn’t exist before, because the state’s so-called Pacheco law made it extremely difficult for state agencies to outsource work. But after the T’s disastrous performance in the winter of 2014-15, the Legislature, at Baker’s urging, gave the agency a three-year exemption from the rule in the same legislation setting up the T’s new oversight board.
Since then, the agency has made modest use of its outsourcing authority, moving to outsource its cash-counting operations and warehouse. The bigger impact, though, has been restoring the balance around the labor negotiating table.
“The issue of the MBTA was not privatization as an ideological matter, but productivity,” Transportation Secretary Stephanie Pollack said. “We needed to have productivity, either from our workers or the private sector.” According to the state, some of the T’s work rules had been in place since 1913.
The union comes out with raises and job security guarantees, which should put to rest the notion that the T was pursuing privatization at all costs. The union could have avoided talks — the old contract isn’t up yet — but, with the looming threat of outsourcing, chose not to.
The successful negotiation should raise a question: Why go back to the old system? The T’s Pacheco exemption expires in less than two years, but the Legislature could choose to extend it. By tying management’s hands so tightly, the Pacheco law practically invites waste. Privatization is not a panacea — and the T has been appropriately judicious about using it — but leaving the possibility on the table gives officials the leverage to get a better deal for the public.
What could be more typical of democratic politics than lobbying elected officials, or working to defeat them if you disapprove of their performance in office?Continue reading »
A white man accused of sexual assault is being transformed into a sympathetic figure. Meanwhile, a black man shot to death in his own home by an officer is smeared as a possible criminal.Continue reading »
Columbia Gas is making a sizeable donation to help people whose homes have been destroyed or lives disrupted. But it’s also fair to ask: Is that it?Continue reading »
There are many reasons why the Monitor Group, an elite Cambridge-based consulting firm that sold expensive advice, went bankrupt.Continue reading »
President Trump can claim some success on the economy, but nowhere near as much as he wants.Continue reading »
The crowd swooned at the White House that day, but it was Yitzhak Rabin whose instincts were right. If only he had heeded his intuition.Continue reading »
Germans are more concerned about the US-Mexican border than they are about their own.Continue reading »
Perpetual population growth with finite resources will lead to disaster.Continue reading »