Mark Wilson/Getty Images
Rank-and-file Republicans and Democrats in Congress have come together to back sensible gun control legislation in the wake of the mass shootings in Las Vegas and Sutherland Springs, Texas. Really, it’s true.
The bipartisan bill would strengthen the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, or NICS, used to check the criminal histories of would-be gun buyers.
But don’t get too heartened by this outbreak of decency.
House Republican leaders, in a truly repugnant maneuver, have packaged the bill with another measure that would loosen restrictions on concealed weapons — hitching a really bad idea to a good one and, in the process, threatening the political prospects of the good one.
Even some fellow Republicans are dismayed by the move.
Over in the Senate, John Cornyn of Texas, who cosponsored an upper-chamber version of the criminal background check measure, says, “We have good bipartisan support” for a stand-alone bill. “It’s really important, and it will save lives,” he recently told the conservative Daily Caller website, “but if we start trying to add other things to it, then I think we risk not doing anything.”
The so-called Fix NICS legislation is modest, but important — reinforcing the requirement that federal agencies report all infractions to the FBI-run background check system and providing states with incentives to improve their own reporting.
NICS’s shortcomings came into focus after reports that the Air Force failed to report Devin Kelley’s domestic violence conviction to the background check system, allowing him to buy the military-style rifle he used in the Sutherland Springs church shooting.
Everyone ought to agree that tightening the system makes sense, and just about everyone does. Even the National Rifle Association has spoken positively about the legislation, seeing a chance to trumpet its call for enforcing current gun laws rather than passing new ones.
But now the background check legislation is in jeopardy, because House Republican leaders are tying it to a bill that Democrats sharply oppose — as they should.
The bill would make concealed-carry permits more like driver’s licenses — valid in every state no matter where they’re issued. That means permits doled out by states with weak gun laws, like Mississippi, would be valid in states with tougher laws, like Massachusetts.
It’s a race to the bottom, in other words. And the same could be said about the House leadership’s overall approach to gun legislation. Republicans of conscience must reject that approach. After all, it’s not just our faith in bipartisan good governance at stake.
With the next Devin Kelley seething somewhere, lives are at stake, too.
Why do any black men vote for the GOP?Continue reading »
The Globe magazine story underscored the need for changes to the emergency response system and accountability for Massachusetts hospitals.Continue reading »
Americans tend to forget World War I. They shouldn’t.Continue reading »
The Union of Concerned Scientists, the venerable Cambridge environmental group, outlines a hard truth in a new report on the need for nuclear power plants.Continue reading »
Neither major political party is addressing the economic concerns of average Americans.Continue reading »
Between the firing of Jeff Sessions and revoking press credentials of a CNN reporter, Trump is behaving like an authoritarian ruler.Continue reading »
The new president of Brazil’s outspoken misogyny and flamboyant racism are beyond disconcerting. Even scarier is his open admiration for dictatorship and torture.Continue reading »
Helen Drinan, who once worked for the Archdiocese of Boston, questions whether the Church is structurally set up to handle sexual misconduct allegations.Continue reading »
Young voters are less likely to be approached by campaigns at all, or to hear about issues that concern them.Continue reading »