Aram Boghosian for The Boston Globe/File/2016
HAS BEACON HILL already botched the Stan Rosenberg investigation? In the controversy involving the former Senate president, critical witnesses who could speak about his husband’s influence and behavior are backing away, afraid of talking to the investigators hired by the Senate.
Rosenberg’s husband, Bryon Hefner, has been accused of sexually assaulting men who work in politics, while hinting that he could use his sway with Rosenberg to help those who yielded to his advances. The men, whose careers rely on good relations with Beacon Hill, have been hesitant to cooperate — especially since the Senate’s process doesn’t protect the anonymity of subpoenaed witnesses, and some senators have mused publicly about reinstating Rosenberg to office.
As reported by Globe columnist Yvonne Abraham last week, at least two alleged victims are not talking — in part because they believe their identities would be revealed. “There is no way I would come forward,” one of the alleged victims told Abraham. “This is an investigation to clear Stan Rosenberg’s name. It’s not an investigation to find out the truth.”
A recent WGBH story revealed that the investigators must seek permission from senators on the ethics committee before issuing subpoenas, raising questions about whether the probe could be truly independent and “comprehensive enough to be credible,” as a Senate staffer put it. The committee is stocked with Rosenberg’s loyalists, raising further doubts.
Given the concerns around the probe, senators shouldn’t treat its findings as the last word. At least two other inquiries, one by state law enforcement and another by the FBI, are also looking at Hefner’s conduct. In a statement, Attorney General Maura Healey said her office was conducting a joint investigation with Suffolk District Attorney Dan Conley, and encouraged “anyone with information about these allegations to come forward and feel safe in telling their stories.”
Many Beacon Hill insiders feel confident Rosenberg will be cleared, in the sense that investigators won’t find evidence he knew of his husband’s alleged assaults. But that’s not the only question. Another is whether the Senate president’s office was compromised by Hefner, who had boasted of his clout. Another is whether Rosenberg can be trusted. Three years ago, Rosenberg promised to keep his personal life and his legislative duties separate, after a series of embarrassing social media posts by Hefner surfaced, in which he bragged about his sway with the senator. That “firewall” clearly didn’t materialize. Senators need to be careful before accepting Rosenberg’s word again.
According to a spokeswoman, Rosenberg and Hefner have separated; Hefner is currently undergoing treatment for alcohol dependency. The Senate shouldn’t reinstall Rosenberg unless investigations clear him, and until senators feel confident that none of Hefner’s alleged actions can be repeated. No matter how much other senators like Rosenberg, a safe workplace should come first.
I started off believing there’s no reason for a nonmilitary person to own a semiautomatic rifle.Continue reading »
Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen may be the face of the manufactured humanitarian disaster, but Miller is the brains.Continue reading »
When it comes to talking about Trump and his supporters, “fascism” is not too extreme a word.Continue reading »
The only thing voters are hearing from the Democrats is hysteria and profanity. It’s not working.Continue reading »
We know exactly who this president is. Let’s not waste any more time giving him the benefit of the doubt.Continue reading »
The so-called Fair Share Amendment was a cynical ploy to get voters to do something they have repeatedly rejected in the past.Continue reading »
As the 44th president departs, he leaves behind a world more dangerous, a country more divided, and a national mood more toxic.Continue reading »
If Republicans are willing to accept the forced separation of children from their parents, they are willing to accept a lot worse.Continue reading »