Aram Boghosian for The Boston Globe/File/2016
HAS BEACON HILL already botched the Stan Rosenberg investigation? In the controversy involving the former Senate president, critical witnesses who could speak about his husband’s influence and behavior are backing away, afraid of talking to the investigators hired by the Senate.
Rosenberg’s husband, Bryon Hefner, has been accused of sexually assaulting men who work in politics, while hinting that he could use his sway with Rosenberg to help those who yielded to his advances. The men, whose careers rely on good relations with Beacon Hill, have been hesitant to cooperate — especially since the Senate’s process doesn’t protect the anonymity of subpoenaed witnesses, and some senators have mused publicly about reinstating Rosenberg to office.
As reported by Globe columnist Yvonne Abraham last week, at least two alleged victims are not talking — in part because they believe their identities would be revealed. “There is no way I would come forward,” one of the alleged victims told Abraham. “This is an investigation to clear Stan Rosenberg’s name. It’s not an investigation to find out the truth.”
A recent WGBH story revealed that the investigators must seek permission from senators on the ethics committee before issuing subpoenas, raising questions about whether the probe could be truly independent and “comprehensive enough to be credible,” as a Senate staffer put it. The committee is stocked with Rosenberg’s loyalists, raising further doubts.
Given the concerns around the probe, senators shouldn’t treat its findings as the last word. At least two other inquiries, one by state law enforcement and another by the FBI, are also looking at Hefner’s conduct. In a statement, Attorney General Maura Healey said her office was conducting a joint investigation with Suffolk District Attorney Dan Conley, and encouraged “anyone with information about these allegations to come forward and feel safe in telling their stories.”
Many Beacon Hill insiders feel confident Rosenberg will be cleared, in the sense that investigators won’t find evidence he knew of his husband’s alleged assaults. But that’s not the only question. Another is whether the Senate president’s office was compromised by Hefner, who had boasted of his clout. Another is whether Rosenberg can be trusted. Three years ago, Rosenberg promised to keep his personal life and his legislative duties separate, after a series of embarrassing social media posts by Hefner surfaced, in which he bragged about his sway with the senator. That “firewall” clearly didn’t materialize. Senators need to be careful before accepting Rosenberg’s word again.
According to a spokeswoman, Rosenberg and Hefner have separated; Hefner is currently undergoing treatment for alcohol dependency. The Senate shouldn’t reinstall Rosenberg unless investigations clear him, and until senators feel confident that none of Hefner’s alleged actions can be repeated. No matter how much other senators like Rosenberg, a safe workplace should come first.
Malls are dying, but you know who’s building stores in America? Dollar Tree and Dollar General.Continue reading »
Betsy DeVos does not understand that public education is a necessary foundation for a democracy.Continue reading »
Her website offers some clues about her.Continue reading »
The Facebook user agreement shouldn’t be the go-to regulation for protecting US consumers or governing ethics online.Continue reading »
This kind of venality at the highest levels of the US government has little modern precedent.Continue reading »
For high school seniors, the college acceptance season just ended. Now, their thoughts turn to, “What should I major in?”Continue reading »
On Thursday, NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre was trafficking in cross-eyed conspiratorial craziness.Continue reading »
The primary moral goal for today’s bioethics can be summarized in a single sentence: Get out of the way.Continue reading »
“We will investigate thoroughly. We will deliberate and decide, and we expect to be held accountable for our actions.”Continue reading »