Before losing a challenge against President Trump’s revised travel ban last spring at a US District Court in Hawaii, the US Department of Justice asked Judge Derrick Watson to consider only the text of the executive order and its stated national security purposes, and to disregard all other evidence — namely, the president’s repeated anti-Muslim comments and tweets that potentially could prove that religious animus motivated the policy.
As the travel ban, in its third iteration, makes its way to the Supreme Court, a different legal challenge based on Trump’s own words has emerged. The Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Economic Justice sued the Trump administration last Thursday, citing the president’s own statements to allege that the government’s decision to terminate a humanitarian program that allowed some Haitians and Salvadorans to live in the United States constitutes racial discrimination against people of color.
Indeed, as Watson succinctly put it, it goes against common sense and logic to ignore what the president has said about certain groups of immigrants. The Lawyers’ Committee argues in the lawsuit that a government policy rooted in bias and discrimination violates the plaintiffs’ equal protection and due process rights guaranteed in the Constitution.
“We’re taking the president’s statements to court,” said Oren Sellstrom, the group’s litigation director.
And there’s plenty to choose from when it comes to Trump’s disparaging comments. In particular, it’s his reported statements about Haiti and El Salvador as “shithole countries” and his comment that all Haitians “have AIDS,” when discussing the fate of the Temporary Protected Status program, that are legally problematic.
“The Supreme Court has laid out what the standards are to be able to show discriminatory intent from the government, and that includes comments and statements made by officials,” Sellstrom said.
What’s so jaw-dropping about this case, as in the case of the travel ban, is the identity of the official: the president of the United States.
Within the next 17 to 19 months, immigrants from Haiti and El Salvador with Temporary Protected Status, including 11,000 in Massachusetts, must leave the country or face deportation. Trump’s decision to terminate the humanitarian program for those countries went against previous administrations’ assessments of the extraordinary conditions, like extreme poverty and rampant violence, which both nations continue to face, according to Trump’s own State Department.
If the president overtly voices racist views — and it should be noted that the president made those disparaging statements about Haitians and Salvadorans in the context of discussing immigration policy — the courts should take his words at face value. Any federal official who displays racial bias in decision-making should expect to be judged accordingly — and it would be bizarre indeed to hold the president to a lower standard than other officials.
Conservatives shouldn’t condemn a liberal who expressed a conservative insight — that the Constitution protects us from overreaching politicians.Continue reading »
The safety of our communities depends on the governor using his power to intervene with National Grid.Continue reading »
It’s a rare day when both Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell earn praise for pushing forward bipartisan legislation.Continue reading »
Restricting prescription drugs for those with chronic diseases is not the solution to lower prices.Continue reading »
Tech giants collect lots of user data. But when it comes to their own companies, executives want plausible deniability.Continue reading »
“The Lord of the Rings” stands on a foundation of profoundly Tory philosophy.Continue reading »
Its reckless intervention will cause a bloodbath with grave humanitarian consequences.Continue reading »
Since her election to Congress 11 years ago, Niki Tsongas staked out her own turf.Continue reading »
Cartoonist Dan Wasserman envisions special counsel Robert Mueller’s gifts to President TrumpContinue reading »