Letters

A closer look at the Blunt amendment

Your piece on the Senate candidates’ positions (“On the issues,” Metro, Nov. 4) left the impression that the Blunt amendment, which Senator Scott Brown cosponsored, merely “would let employers or insurers refuse to provide birth control or other preventive services they oppose on moral or religious grounds.” True, but incomplete.

Under the amendment, which was defeated in the Senate, employers or insurers would not have had to provide any medical services that they oppose on moral or religious grounds. If you bleed a lot, don’t go to work for an employer who doesn’t believe in blood transfusions or who believes only in praying illnesses away.

Tom Kenny

Falmouth

Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com