You can now read 5 articles in a month for free on Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.

letters | Mass. Moves to save water sources

Proposed limits don’t do enough to protect resources

In 1986 the Water Management Act required state authorities to set “safe yield” limits that specify how much water can be pumped from river basins (“A move to save water sources,” Page A1, Nov. 29). After a quarter-century of pumping so much water that rivers dry up, they are finally getting around to it.

Unfortunately, the proposed limits are far higher than current withdrawals that are already stressing many river basins — almost double the current withdrawals in the Charles River basin, more than triple those in the Concord River basin, and six times higher than in the Parker River basin. Taking that much water would certainly not be safe for fish, or for businesses that rely on recreation or tourism.

Continue reading below

Withdrawal limits should protect all that depends on healthy, flowing rivers, while affording municipalities time to comply. At least that way we’d be moving in the right direction over the 20-year duration of the next round of municipal water withdrawal permits, instead of continuing to accommodate wasteful water use practices that degrade rivers, impair drinking water quality, increase greenhouse gas emissions, and drive up the cost of water for everyone.

Paul Lauenstein


Loading comments...
Want each day's news headlines delivered fresh to your
inbox every morning? Just connect with us
in one of the following ways:
Please enter a valid email will never post anything without asking.
Privacy Policy
Subscriber Log In

You have reached the limit of 5 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of
Marketing image of