letters | sunday forum

We ought to feel a taxing tug to guide our conservation

Regarding Brookline’s ban on plastic shopping bags, Al Lewis writes that the optimal solution is to tax retailers a penny or so per bag — little enough that retailers wouldn’t pass the tax to consumers — and spend that money on conservation measures (“Think of it as an exercise in economics,” Letters, Dec. 2). On the contrary, the solution is to impose a tax large enough that retailers would choose to pass it on, so that consumers would have a direct and clear incentive to avoid plastic bags.

In fact, the optimal solution is to tax both plastic and paper bags, with a higher tax on plastic because of its greater long-term environmental harm, to discourage, but not forbid, the use of throwaway bags.


Unfortunately, towns don’t have the power to impose a tax without the state Legislature’s permission. Since the Legislature doesn’t act, I say good for Brookline for taking what action it can.

Sue Felshin


Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
You're reading  1 of 5 free articles.
Get UNLIMITED access for only 99¢ per week Subscribe Now >
You're reading1 of 5 free articles.Keep scrolling to see more articles recomended for you Subscribe now
We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com