Letters

letters | DIVERSITY IN THE HALLS OF CONGRESS

More women means more liberalism

ELECTING MORE women “for the sake of democracy” as Swanee Hunt argues (Op-ed, Jan. 2 ), ignores the fact that women have historically favored the candidates and government programs that improve their “safety net.” Several years ago, John R. Lott Jr. and Lawrence W. Kenny, published a paper, “Did Women’s Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government?”

One chart shows the per capita state expenditures rising dramatically after women were allowed to vote in different states.

Advertisement

The authors conclude that giving women the right to vote dramatically changed American politics from the very beginning. Suffrage coincided with immediate dramatic increases in state government expenditures and revenue, and these effects continued growing as more women took advantage of the franchise.

Similar changes occurred at the federal level as female suffrage led to more liberal voting records for congressional delegations.

Arnold Koch

Melrose

Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com