letters | US attorney under fire in swartz case

Power, political role of US attorneys should be debated

One of the few positive aspects of the tragic case of Aaron Swartz is that it has led to an almost unprecedented level of scrutiny of the office of US attorney. Despite its immense power, this office operates with little, if any, accountability to the public for its actions. Part of the scrutiny ought to include the political role of the US attorney, both as a regulator of state politics — through anticorruption prosecutions — and as a potential participant in state politics — as a candidate for high office.

In the Swartz case, for example, US Attorney Carmen Ortiz’s efforts to defend her actions are impeded by the perception that they were politically motivated. I think this criticism is unfair, but the present system encourages it.


Any number of changes could be considered. Might the president, for example, require that a nominee for the post refrain from political activity for two years upon leaving it? Many such proposals would raise constitutional and other issues, but we ought to take advantage of the current teachable moment to debate them.

George D. Brown


The writer is a professor at Boston College Law School.

Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com