Letters

letters | SHOULD ‘LINCOLN’ BE HISTORICALLY ACCURAT E?

Directors should be held to basic standards

IT SEEMS reasonable to expect some fidelity to the historic record in a movie like “Lincoln,” even in the light of the right of artists to take some license to create dramatic tension (“As a teacher of history, Hollywood isn’t high school,” Editorial, Feb. 18).

Besides misrepresenting the vote of the Connecticut delegation, the film recounts the vote of a Congressman Washburn as “nay”, when, in fact, there were two members of Congress named Washburn (brothers William and Elihu) who were abolitionists, supporters of the president, and who both voted in favor of the amendment.

Advertisement

While your advice to approach Hollywood’s output with “a bit of skepticism” is well taken, your editorial sets the bar too low for accuracy in historical drama.

Charles J. Washburn

Worcester

Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
You're reading  1 of 5 free articles.
Get UNLIMITED access for only 99¢ per week Subscribe Now >
You're reading1 of 5 free articles.Keep scrolling to see more articles recomended for you Subscribe now
We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com