Now that Americans are among targets, an overdue debate begins

I DON’T often agree with John E. Sununu, but his Feb. 19 op-ed, “For Obama, a license to kill,” made many good points.

Only now that four US citizens have been targeted has the debate intensified. 


The issue is whether the president has the legal and ethical right to identify, target, and execute US citizens who he and his support staff have decided are enemies of the state. It is only now feeling more real, given that someon targeted could be “one of our own.”

What disturbs me is that the debate was relatively silent when we thought we were only dealing with foreign insurgents. There were few questions regarding the lack of transparency, the vague definition of imminent threat, and tolerance for “collateral damage.” 

Get Arguable with Jeff Jacoby in your inbox:
Our conservative columnist offers a weekly take on everything from politics to pet peeves.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

Does it really matter if these targets are US citizens or not? The technology and the policy is new and, I believe, deeply disturbing.

Mark Golden


Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
You're reading  1 of 5 free articles.
Get UNLIMITED access for only 99¢ per week Subscribe Now >
You're reading1 of 5 free articles.Keep scrolling to see more articles recomended for you Subscribe now
We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com