Overhead on federal research grants is essential

As a scientist who has spent much of his career in building research programs in academic institutions, I was distressed by the perspective of the article “Research giants win on funding: Fend off US bid to cut overhead payments” (Page A1, March 18). I can assert that the overhead on federal grants is essential, and is often increased by accounting requirements of the grants themselves. In contrast, private foundation grants often do not allow such charges while imposing awkward administrative demands, a significant further financial burden.

Expecting a research institution to function effectively without paying the full costs of the institution is the equivalent of expecting that the purchase of a 5-gallon can of gasoline will provide a driver and a fully operating automobile ready for indefinite use.

George M. Woodwell

Woods Hole

The writer is founder and director emeritus of the Woods Hole Research Center.

Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com