Downtown Crossing still needs a retail anchor

Holiday shoppers visited Downtown Crossing in 2012.


Holiday shoppers visited Downtown Crossing in 2012.

RE “A Downtown Crossing worth the wait” by Paul McMorrow (Op-ed, April 2): Like all Bostonians, I look forward to the transformation of Downtown Crossing into a dynamic 24-seven neighborhood with a large residential base and innovative businesses and retail. Nonetheless, I reject McMorrow’s premise that the shuttering of Filene’s, not just the stalled redevelopment, ultimately benefits the district.

For all of Downtown Crossing’s alleged problems, do people forget that it was a vital retail hub until the mid-2000s? All the major closings — Filene’s, Filene’s Basement, Borders, Barnes and Noble, HMV, even Jordan Marsh — resulted from gratuitous corporate mergers or larger retailing trends, not from any lack of inherent economic viability in this dense retail hub.


Developers have a vested interest in cultivating a phoenix myth to put the best spin on the final outcome, especially if uninspired tenants such as, God forbid, a bank “flagship” were to open. Essential to the vitality that McMorrow envisions is securing a truly inspired tenant for the historic Filene’s building to anchor the district: Nordstrom, New York’s Century 21 department store, or, if one is permitted to dream, a unique American outlet of an international emporium, such as Harrod’s or Printemps, with a superb foods section.

Macy’s, which is ultimately responsible for the Downtown Crossing fiasco, would benefit from some competition.

Jonathan Unglaub


Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.