You can now read 5 articles in a month for free on Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.


No reason to cheer India drug verdict

THE INDIAN Supreme Court’s decision on Gleevec will surely help some patients seeking affordable treatment (“US should tighten rules for patenting changes to drugs,” Editorial, April 8), but there is no guarantee that local companies can reproduce a drug that is as safe or effective as the original, especially when they have no data-sharing agreement with the company that designed it.

Quality assurance depends on India’s drug regulator, which is plagued with problems; a parliamentary report last year accused the agency of extensive corruption and misrepresentation of pharmaceutical drug data.

Continue reading below

Foreign investments in India are one of the strongest tools to counteract these corrupt forces — by working hand-in-glove with Indian pharmaceutical companies and government agencies to improve oversight, information-sharing, management, and product quality. The court’s decision will discourage these investments.

That should be a concern for anyone celebrating the Gleevec decision. Increasing access to medicines of uncertain quality is hardly a victory for public health.

Dr. Roger Bate

American Enterprise


Loading comments...
Want each day's news headlines delivered fresh to your
inbox every morning? Just connect with us
in one of the following ways:
Please enter a valid email will never post anything without asking.
Privacy Policy
Subscriber Log In

You have reached the limit of 5 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of
Marketing image of