You can now read 5 articles in a month for free on Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.


In case of sex abuse, it is wrong to attach word ‘alleged’ to victims

I think that it is improper to call a 5-year-old victim an “accuser” in a story about John Burbine (“Accused in sex abuse case faces more charges,” Metro, May 1). The accuser is the state, and the child is but a witness for the prosecution. The word “accuser” also wrongly connotes that the child, rather than the government, bears the burden of proof.

The story also wrongly uses the phrase “alleged victim.” The allegations are against Burbine, which means the language should state that the child is a victim of alleged crimes. Using the word “alleged” to modify the word “victim” wrongly attaches skepticism to the word of the child.

Continue reading below

While it may be appropriate to use language that properly conveys Burbine’s status as charged but not yet convicted, those words should attach to the state because the criminal justice system is not the sole arbiter of truth.

Whatever happens to the charges in a court of law, these young people have a right to declare themselves ACTUAL, not “alleged,” victims in the real world.

Wendy Murphy


The writer is director of the Center for Law and Social Responsibility’s Judicial Language Project at New England Law.

Loading comments...
Want each day's news headlines delivered fresh to your
inbox every morning? Just connect with us
in one of the following ways:
Please enter a valid email will never post anything without asking.
Privacy Policy
Subscriber Log In

You have reached the limit of 5 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of
Marketing image of