letters | learning from last week’s election

Time to get rid of special elections

I AGREE with the theme of Tom Keane’s column, “This match never lit” (Op-ed, June 25). But truly this special election was doomed from the start, because of the changes made to election laws in 2004 regarding Senate vacancies.

Even as a Democrat, I have to say that changing the law to rob former governor Mitt Romney of a Senate appointment if John Kerry were elected president was nothing but petty partisanship. Changing it again in 2009 to allow a temporary appointment upon Senator Kennedy's passing was not a real fix, though it’s good not to leave the seat vacant while awaiting an election.


The real way to address this problem, and stop burdening Massachusetts voters with seemingly endless electioneering, is to repeal the ’04 and ’09 changes. Should another Senate vacancy occur, allow the governor (whoever that may be) to appoint a replacement until the next general election, when voters are relatively engaged: every two years, in the fall.

Adam Green


Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
You're reading  1 of 5 free articles.
Get UNLIMITED access for only 99¢ per week Subscribe Now >
You're reading1 of 5 free articles.Keep scrolling to see more articles recomended for you Subscribe now
We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com