You can now read 5 articles in a month for free on Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.


Voters must have say on flawed casino law

ATTORNEY GENERAL Martha Coakley’s rejection of Repeal the Casino Deal’s submission of a ballot initiative petition for 2014 to repeal the law legalizing casinos and slots in this state was a slap in the face of democracy. This is a controversial issue that warrants serious public discussion and debate and should be decided by the people of Massachusetts, who will have to live with casinos and all their negative impacts.

Sure, residents of potential casino host communities can vote on whether they want a casino in their midst. But not neighboring communities, who don’t benefit from mitigation money but have to live with the traffic, pollution, drunk drivers, the siren song of addictive slots, and all the other drawbacks.

Continue reading below

Any resident of this state who doesn’t like the corrupting influence of casinos won’t have a say. I am ashamed that our attorney general would so blatantly disregard this right that we voters are supposed to enjoy: to be able to put issues on the ballot and vote on them.

Charlotte Burns


Loading comments...
Want each day's news headlines delivered fresh to your
inbox every morning? Just connect with us
in one of the following ways:
Please enter a valid email will never post anything without asking.
Privacy Policy
Subscriber Log In

You have reached the limit of 5 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of
Marketing image of