Town meetings exclude too many

A HEARTY hear, hear to Edward Glaeser (“Too much hot air at town meetings,” Op-ed, Oct. 17).

As a former New Yorker who moved here a decade ago, I’ve found the concept of town meeting befuddling, archaic, and potentially disenfranchising to a lot of people.


Residents may miss the town meeting because they’re sick, because of a business meeting out of town, or because of an ill or no-show babysitter. So even if I’ve attended every open committee meeting on the subject at Town Hall, read every long-winded letter to the editor in our local newspaper and in our local online resources, attended a League of Women Voters’ coffee on the subject, talked about it with neighbors and colleagues prior to the meeting, and am a taxpayer in good standing, if I’m not physically at the town meeting, I’m essentially disenfranchised.

There must be a better way — one that reflects the realities of engagement and time constraints in the 21st century.

Dianne E. Butt


Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com