LETTERS | NRC HALT TO CANCER STUDY RAISES QUESTIONS
It is pretty obvious why the Nuclear Regulatory Commission does not want any new research on whether living within 31 miles of a nuclear power plant causes cancer (“NRC’s puzzling about-face on cancer study,” Editorial, Sept. 12). Recent studies in France and Germany both show that living near a nuclear plant doubles the risk of cancer in children. The 1990 National Cancer Institute study that the NRC loves to cite is outdated and heavily flawed. It seems the NRC wants to block scientific research on possible cancer streaks in order to make sure that the public remains in the dark about this important issue.
The public should be aware that the NRC is funded largely by fees paid by the nuclear industry that this agency is supposed to regulate. No wonder it continues to act in the interests of its money stream rather than in the interests of the public. Actions speak louder than words — the blocking of research by the National Academy of Sciences demonstrates the true colors of the NRC and the nuclear industry.
The author is a retired professor in the field of neuroscience.
After Boston’s leaders received a brief telegram about the tragedy, it was hard to predict how they would respond.Continue reading »
Although the practice of declawing cats is on the wane, some landlords in Massachusetts require it.Continue reading »
There’s a lot more agreement on supposedly “divisive” questions than you might think.Continue reading »
All speech, even hateful speech, is protected.Continue reading »
Mayor Walsh wooed General Electric to Boston thinking he was getting a thriving company.Continue reading »
With a few mouse clicks, Facebook allows you to categorize your friends. It’s about time.Continue reading »
This is more than just another travel ban. It is a geopolitical spectacle unique in modern history.Continue reading »
Despite specific visible acts of racial violence, the broader effects of racial discrimination are often unrecognized.Continue reading »
By the numbers, Democrats dominate Massachusetts politics. But Republican Governor Charlie Baker runs the show.Continue reading »