LETTERS | NRC HALT TO CANCER STUDY RAISES QUESTIONS
It is pretty obvious why the Nuclear Regulatory Commission does not want any new research on whether living within 31 miles of a nuclear power plant causes cancer (“NRC’s puzzling about-face on cancer study,” Editorial, Sept. 12). Recent studies in France and Germany both show that living near a nuclear plant doubles the risk of cancer in children. The 1990 National Cancer Institute study that the NRC loves to cite is outdated and heavily flawed. It seems the NRC wants to block scientific research on possible cancer streaks in order to make sure that the public remains in the dark about this important issue.
The public should be aware that the NRC is funded largely by fees paid by the nuclear industry that this agency is supposed to regulate. No wonder it continues to act in the interests of its money stream rather than in the interests of the public. Actions speak louder than words — the blocking of research by the National Academy of Sciences demonstrates the true colors of the NRC and the nuclear industry.
The author is a retired professor in the field of neuroscience.
The evidence that Trump has acted as an agent of the Russians — either wittingly or unwittingly — is overwhelming.Continue reading »
It is a stain on America’s reputation that it elected a president who professes to see more honor in our enemies than in the leaders of the US Congress.Continue reading »
There are only a handful of people who know the truth about Donald Trump and Russia.Continue reading »
By focusing on housing and things the city can and should be allowed to do on its own, Marty Walsh shows the seriousness of his intent.Continue reading »
As Donald Trump stands firm, some look to Congress to break the logjam over border security.Continue reading »
Steve King isn’t a glitch in the GOP machine. The party has long tolerated and embraced his racism.Continue reading »
“Governor Baker has settled for me any question of whether he is a real Republican.”Continue reading »
“She may have learned the social media part of a politician’s job brilliantly, but that still leaves a lot for her to learn.”Continue reading »
Readers object to Garry Wills’s op-ed questioning the very notion of priests.Continue reading »