LETTERS | NRC HALT TO CANCER STUDY RAISES QUESTIONS
It is pretty obvious why the Nuclear Regulatory Commission does not want any new research on whether living within 31 miles of a nuclear power plant causes cancer (“NRC’s puzzling about-face on cancer study,” Editorial, Sept. 12). Recent studies in France and Germany both show that living near a nuclear plant doubles the risk of cancer in children. The 1990 National Cancer Institute study that the NRC loves to cite is outdated and heavily flawed. It seems the NRC wants to block scientific research on possible cancer streaks in order to make sure that the public remains in the dark about this important issue.
The public should be aware that the NRC is funded largely by fees paid by the nuclear industry that this agency is supposed to regulate. No wonder it continues to act in the interests of its money stream rather than in the interests of the public. Actions speak louder than words — the blocking of research by the National Academy of Sciences demonstrates the true colors of the NRC and the nuclear industry.
The author is a retired professor in the field of neuroscience.
On Thursday, NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre was trafficking in cross-eyed conspiratorial craziness.Continue reading »
Decades of painstaking work to balance ecological needs with local economies are being wiped away.Continue reading »
Trump’s travel bans are about identity, emotion, and politics, not logic, national security, or law.Continue reading »
The mass public shooting has become a defining phenomenon of our age.Continue reading »
Why did seven Nobel laureates associate with a firm that markets an unproven dietary supplement?Continue reading »
Free and decent nations don’t wall themselves off from friendly neighbors with colossal barricades.Continue reading »
The prosperity that Denmark, Sweden, and Norway enjoy today was built with free-market reforms in the past.Continue reading »
From all around the world, refugees and immigrants still come to the USA, hoping for a better life.Continue reading »
A new optimistic view of the world seems at odds with the carnage in the United States.Continue reading »