Risks of nuclear power are not to be taken lightly

Nuclear power is much less benign than Joshua S. Goldstein and Steven Pinker make it out to be (“Inconvenient truths for the environmental movement,” Opinion, Nov. 23). Today, nearly 30 years after the Chernobyl disaster, humans are barred from reinhabiting a 1,000-square-mile exclusion zone where dangerous radiation levels persist. In Japan, tens of thousands of people are still not able to return safely to their homes because of nuclear contamination surrounding the Fukushima plant.

The authors also ignore the risks of radioactive materials getting into the wrong hands in a highly unstable world. The slope from civilian nuclear power to weapons development is a steep and dangerous one, as Iran’s brinkmanship has amply shown. Beyond what rogue states might undertake, why increase the number of targets for ideologically driven non-state actors hell-bent on creating chaos?


Instead of propping up a precarious and elusive panacea, we should make an all-out push to develop wind and solar power. These renewable technologies, not nuclear power, are quickly proving themselves to be “the world’s most abundant and scalable carbon-free energy” sources.

Philip Warburg


The writer is the former president of the Conservation Law Foundation.

Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com