In response to Renée Loth’s “Why do so many believe fake news?” (Opinion, Oct. 31), I would like to offer a corrective. Consider the definition of the word “opinion.” Opinions, like theories, are based on an unbiased assessment of the verifiable data (facts), and, like theories, are changeable as our understanding of the facts changes. However, what many people call an opinion is actually, in rhetorical terms, a prejudice, a belief that is not based on fact.
We do not use prejudices in critical analyses because they cannot be reproduced (think scientific method). The problem is, when someone says “in my opinion,” they usually mean “because I choose to believe this” rather than “I have reasoned this out using critical thinking.” Because some dictionaries have begun to accept this common misuse of the word “opinion,” people can legitimately claim their so-called version carries the same weight as a legitimate opinion derived from critical analysis.
When we refuse to acknowledge that uninformed opinions are choices rather than positions based on facts, we muddy the waters and open ourselves to the concept of fake news. We must insist on these distinctions between opinions and beliefs, and push people and reporters to document the critical process behind their conclusions. Once critical thinking becomes the norm, fake news will have to struggle and, hopefully, will fade away.
I enjoyed Renée Loth’s column, “Why do so many believe fake news?” The mention of tabloid newspapers routinely printing lies is significant. Another cultural phenomenon that is part of the mix is professional wrestling. It’s not that the fans cannot tell the difference between what is real and what is illusion. They simply don’t care. They want bloodthirsty entertainment, a show that ignites all their passions. Watch some pro wrestling. You will see all the strategies needed to win the presidency these days.
This is an adversarial confrontation, and reasonable people could disagree about the appropriate procedural steps. But there are certain basic rules that must be followed for hearings of this kind to be fair.Continue reading »
Amid a “retail apocalypse,” pop-up stores are booming. Boston should do everything it can to encourage the trend.Continue reading »
Allegations of sexual misconduct shouldn’t be accepted as true simply because they are made by a woman.Continue reading »
Trump lieutenants Betsy DeVos and Mick Mulvaney wage a quiet war against 20-somethings and in favor of the companies and schools trying to squeeze money out of them.Continue reading »
Ford’s silence in 1982 is as logical as it is tragic. Elite private institutions have long protected their status over their students. Women do not tell their stories, because they can’t.Continue reading »
“The sculpture ‘The Embrace,’ by not making any reference to the obvious, might effectively subvert racism and hate.”Continue reading »
Now he looks even more like a mini-Trump.Continue reading »
The integrity of the institution and selection of its members is on trial right now.Continue reading »
Like Tubman, Cynthia Erivo is black; unlike Tubman, she’s British. Should that disqualify her from playing an iconic African-American heroine?Continue reading »