Higher education’s opposition to the House tax plan is laughable (“Colleges prepare to fight against GOP’s tax plan,” Page A1, Nov. 4). Every time Congress has passed legislation in an attempt to make college more affordable, the universities have raised tuition at rates that rival the health industry. In 1977, the tuition for a high-end private college was about $4,000. In 40 years, tuition has risen to about $50,000, more than 12 times the 1977 rate. In contrast, median family income has risen from about $12,000 to $53,000.
Here’s an idea for the universities: They could easily compensate for students’ loss of deductions for student loan interest under the GOP plan by lowering tuition. A $2,500 deduction is worth only $625 at the 25 percent tax bracket, which is equal to a 1.25 percent reduction in tuition. If you need help figuring out where to cut, I’ll be happy to help.
Re “Colleges prepare to fight against GOP’s tax plan” by Deirdre Fernandes: Michael Armini, a senior vice president of external affairs at Northeastern University, says that colleges will lobby members of Congress to alter the proposed tax package to assure that reforms won’t “create disincentives for people to pursue a college degree.” This borders on the absurd. There may be problems with the proposed tax package that require further consideration. But it is ludicrous to suggest that taxing some college endowments, or eliminating the deduction for interest paid on student loans, is going to be a factor in a student’s decision to attend college.
This calls to mind the comment credited to Russell B. Long, the longtime senator from Louisiana, who, as chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, said that for most people, tax reform meant, “Don’t tax you, don’t tax me, tax that fellow behind the tree.” Surely college administrators can find a more compelling and persuasive rationale for objecting to the sections of the tax reform proposal that will affect colleges and their students.
In a church known for shipping provocative priests to a figurative gulag, James Martin has willingly stuck his neck out.Continue reading »
The next financial crisis will not be like the last one. But there will be a next one.Continue reading »
An exposé revealed that Edmond Mulet, the UN Joint Secretary-General for Peacekeeping Operations, was investigated for child trafficking.Continue reading »
Venezuela’s economic pain shows why the subsidies must go — and why now is the perfect time.Continue reading »
“I have never heard a member of the public tell me that I should go easier on the drug dealers pouring these deadly substances into their communities.”Continue reading »
All speech, even hateful speech, is protected.Continue reading »
Women are routinely excluded from the top posts.Continue reading »
This is more than just another travel ban. It is a geopolitical spectacle unique in modern history.Continue reading »
Repeal would run counter to our national interest in at least two ways.Continue reading »