Jeff Jacoby’s op-ed on the “myth” of voter suppression is a classic case of obfuscation by statistics (Ideas, Dec. 31). Yes, black turnout in Alabama was greater than white turnout. As Jacoby notes, there were good reasons for that — in the recent Alabama election and in others, also noted by Jacoby. But that should not diminish our understanding of the very real attempts to suppress black voters in Alabama and elsewhere.
In Texas, a clear statistical analysis, accepted by at least two federal courts, found that voter ID restrictions adversely affected black and Hispanic voters to an extent almost twice that of white voters. High black turnout in any (or even all) elections does not diminish this intended effect. It is illegal, and Texas has been ordered by the courts to fix it.
The lesson from Alabama is not that voter suppression is a myth. It’s that properly motivated voters can truly affect the results.
A radical bill in California offers an environmental and economic jackpot — and a lesson for Massachusetts.Continue reading »
The UK needs a do-over debate on leaving the European Union.Continue reading »
The more intense the threats and pressure from China grow, the more distinct Taiwan’s sense of a separate national identity has become.Continue reading »
“China wants the United States to follow the communiqués framework only, which marginalizes Taiwan.”Continue reading »
Google and Facebook don’t do the painstaking work of developing sources and uncovering corruption, but reap enormous profits from those who do.Continue reading »
Every day, there’s a fresh outrage to begin the cycle anew. Wash. Rinse. Repeat.Continue reading »
If Trump’s staff are so concerned, why are they still working for him?Continue reading »
A year of opinions, revisited.Continue reading »
That any state would still insist on adulterating the holiday on which America honors Martin Luther King by paying tribute to Lee is grotesque.Continue reading »