Jeff Jacoby’s op-ed on the “myth” of voter suppression is a classic case of obfuscation by statistics (Ideas, Dec. 31). Yes, black turnout in Alabama was greater than white turnout. As Jacoby notes, there were good reasons for that — in the recent Alabama election and in others, also noted by Jacoby. But that should not diminish our understanding of the very real attempts to suppress black voters in Alabama and elsewhere.
In Texas, a clear statistical analysis, accepted by at least two federal courts, found that voter ID restrictions adversely affected black and Hispanic voters to an extent almost twice that of white voters. High black turnout in any (or even all) elections does not diminish this intended effect. It is illegal, and Texas has been ordered by the courts to fix it.
The lesson from Alabama is not that voter suppression is a myth. It’s that properly motivated voters can truly affect the results.
Betsy DeVos is likely to repeal President Obama’s policy designed to disrupt the school-to-prison pipeline.Continue reading »
A sticky note on the nuclear button says, “DO NOT FIRE.” Similar notes are pasted regarding H.R. McMaster, John Kelly, and Robert Mueller.Continue reading »
As the 44th president departs, he leaves behind a world more dangerous, a country more divided, and a national mood more toxic.Continue reading »
MIT’s new startup support accelerator, The Engine, is intended to close the gap between transformative new-science innovations and the long trek to the marketplace.Continue reading »
The language the opponents use is telling.Continue reading »
The Facebook user agreement shouldn’t be the go-to regulation for protecting US consumers or governing ethics online.Continue reading »
Harvard is sending a message with a classic free speech chill: You can say anything — but not here.Continue reading »
This case is a reminder why police departments must cultivate community relationships and train officers in appropriate procedures.Continue reading »