I absolutely disagree with Jeff Jacoby (“Trump’s Berlin Wall,” Opinion, Feb. 4). The wall proposed along the border with Mexico is not a “wall of shame.” It is a wall for safety and security. Jacoby opposes it because of its high cost and because, he says, it is immoral and it won’t work. Comparing it with East Germany’s construction of the Berlin Wall, Jacoby writes that “the point of Trump’s wall would be to keep foreigners out! Perhaps so.” No, not perhaps so, but absolutely so — and not merely “foreigners,” but illegal invaders too, whatever the cost.
Trump ran for president on the promise of a wall. His supporters want a wall. A country with no borders is not a country.
The Vatican has walls. The White House has a wall and shoulder-to-shoulder security. Barack Obama’s new house in Washington has a wall. There are several walls in Israel that have reduced, to a drip, terrorist incursions into Israel. Everyone, including Jacoby, has a lock on his front door.
Jacoby comes close to calling supporters of a wall deplorable. I’ve had enough of that insult already, from Hillary Clinton.
Two mothers became the voice of reason over children being torn from their parent’s arms and sent to mass detention centers.Continue reading »
Massachusetts just dodged the economic bullet of the so-called millionaires tax.Continue reading »
The issue of migration will be seen by future historians as the fatal solvent of the EU.Continue reading »
We know exactly who this president is. Let’s not waste any more time giving him the benefit of the doubt.Continue reading »
A lawsuit against Harvard supports a false narrative about discrimination in college admissions.Continue reading »
After Citizens United, our elected representatives spend countless hours courting the wealthy.Continue reading »
In Everett, a mother and her son are trying to stay together, despite a draconian immigration policy.Continue reading »
The Trump administration has invoked the Bible to support its traumatizing and cruel border policy.Continue reading »