President Trump, fearful that the world is “laughing at us,” appears to take trade policy as a matter of national pride, economics be damned. But why shouldn’t the rest of the world respond to his bullying in terms of pride as well, damning economics in turn?
Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross may be right that, as the result of a 25 percent tax on foreign steel, an American consumer purchasing an American car would pay a “tax” of only $175; from an American perspective, that additional cost might well be acceptable if it saved a steelworker’s job or two. But suppose a European consumer decides, as a matter of countervailing pride, to purchase a Fiat instead of a marginally preferable Ford?
Multiply the loss of that sale across tens of thousands of consumers in dozens of sectors in 100 countries worldwide, and the impact on our economy could be enormous, all without any government going toe-to-toe with the United States in a trade war. This will not end well, nor should it.
A white man accused of sexual assault is being transformed into a sympathetic figure. Meanwhile, a black man shot to death in his own home by an officer is smeared as a possible criminal.Continue reading »
Who, really, do they think they are fooling?Continue reading »
Now he looks even more like a mini-Trump.Continue reading »
Financial history has not ended, any more than political history ended with the fall of the Berlin Wall.Continue reading »
The statistics of a strong economy don’t represent the tough reality for millions of people working multiple jobs.Continue reading »
The aftermath of Hurricane Maria exposed the cracks and contradictions in the island’s untenable political status.Continue reading »
Members of the once-proud governing elite have been supplanted by an unstable and unqualified demagogue who treats them with contempt.Continue reading »
A central pillar of President Trump’s politics is a sustained assault on the free press. Journalists are not classified as fellow Americans, but rather “the enemy of the people.”Continue reading »
A person of questionable ethics shouldn’t be on the Supreme Court.Continue reading »