President Trump, fearful that the world is “laughing at us,” appears to take trade policy as a matter of national pride, economics be damned. But why shouldn’t the rest of the world respond to his bullying in terms of pride as well, damning economics in turn?
Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross may be right that, as the result of a 25 percent tax on foreign steel, an American consumer purchasing an American car would pay a “tax” of only $175; from an American perspective, that additional cost might well be acceptable if it saved a steelworker’s job or two. But suppose a European consumer decides, as a matter of countervailing pride, to purchase a Fiat instead of a marginally preferable Ford?
Multiply the loss of that sale across tens of thousands of consumers in dozens of sectors in 100 countries worldwide, and the impact on our economy could be enormous, all without any government going toe-to-toe with the United States in a trade war. This will not end well, nor should it.
Talking about racial and gender inclusion isn’t tantamount to doing something about it.Continue reading »
The movie falsely romanticizes an exploitative relationship between a grown man and a teenager.Continue reading »
Wynn Resorts has disqualified itself under the state’s gaming legislation from continuing as a licensed gaming operator.Continue reading »
Boston is intoxicated with its illustrious past, but the city has a history of failure when it comes to addressing racism.Continue reading »
This kind of venality at the highest levels of the US government has little modern precedent.Continue reading »
One would be hard-pressed to identify a single notable diplomatic accomplishment that Tillerson has achieved.Continue reading »
Why is it that the Palestinians rejected Israel’s offer for an independent state in 2000, 2001, and 2008?Continue reading »
Fundamentalism has fused with unfettered capitalism.Continue reading »
A new optimistic view of the world seems at odds with the carnage in the United States.Continue reading »