Letters
    Next Score View the next score

    Letters

    House leadership battle: new blood, or just bloodletting?

    In this Nov. 15, 2018, photo, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., leaves a news conference at the Capitol in Washington. Pelosi’s bid to return as House speaker is putting newly elected Democrats in a spot. The speaker’s vote will among the first votes cast in the new Congress, with all eyes will be watching -- and cameras rolling for TV ads -- to see if the incoming freshmen who promised to oppose Pelosi on the campaign trail will actually do so in the House chamber. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
    /J. Scott Applewhite/AP
    House minority leader Nancy Pelosi leaves a news conference at the Capitol in Washington Nov. 15.

    Moulton puts Democrats’ unity at risk

    Although I have never met him, I have long admired US Representative Seth Moulton as a new breed of candidate who is truthful and direct with the voters. I believe him to be an asset as a member of the Massachusetts delegation.

    However, I am concerned that, by challenging Nancy Pelosi’s leadership (“Peril in being point man in anti-Pelosi push,” Page A1, Nov. 20), he may destroy any chance of unity the new Democratic-controlled House will have. We have only two years to make the case to the voters in America that we can be better. No one is more talented and able to make that happen than Pelosi, a seasoned speaker.

    Merely being new and young doesn’t make one effective. Just look at Paul Ryan.

    John Gardiner

    Waltham

    GOP demonizes Pelosi because she’s effective

    Advertisement

    The movement to stop Nancy Pelosi from returning as speaker of the House could prove costly, both for Massachusetts and its congressional delegation and for the country (“Welcome to the Hill. Now vote!” Page A1, Nov. 15).

    Get Today in Opinion in your inbox:
    Globe Opinion's must-reads, delivered to you every Sunday-Friday.
    Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

    Pelosi is demonized by Republicans primarily because she has been so effective. Democrats attacked Newt Gingrich in 1994 for similar reasons.

    Our ambitious newly elected Democratic members of Congress should be proud to follow Pelosi’s lead.

    Not only was she the first female speaker, but she has more knowledge, energy, and political savvy than most congressmen half her age. Political pundits have argued that she will be recognized in history as one of the greatest speakers of the House.

    Ageism is a prejudicial attitude, and just as serious as sexism or racism. It should not be a factor in this very important upcoming vote.

    Walter Horan

    Marblehead

    Fresh leadership is needed

    Advertisement

    Re “Peril in being point man in anti-Pelosi push”: Let’s thank Seth Moulton for initiating the leadership succession process in the Democratic Party. After the midterm elections, the Democrats are stronger, with more young talent and diversity at every level of elected office. To meet their lofty goals, these newly elected representatives must advocate for fresh leadership with a vision for the United States that looks toward the future.

    Thomas H. Friedman

    Newton

    Rake leaves — and Congress

    Renée Loth (“Yard work, unplugged”) and Joan Vennochi (“Thank you, Seth Moulton, for shaking up the leadership”) have it right. Both leaves and entrenched, entitled politicians need to be swept aside to make way for new growth.

    Bob Segal

    Providence

    Wise leaders have a succession plan

    Joan Vennochi said it well: “Keeping power is not a right.” But I would add: Wise leaders identify and mentor possible successors. So why are all three of the House Democratic leaders holding onto power rather than giving one or more newer members an opportunity to learn and grow into leadership?

    Cynthia Snow

    Brookline

    A nay vote on ageism

    Calling Nancy Pelosi and House minority whip Steny Hoyer “geezers” is ageist. The term geezer is insulting to all older people. Joan Vennochi should have a large enough vocabulary to stick to issues, not name-calling.

    Annabel Dodd

    Framingham