DETROIT — General Motors’ deadly ignition switch flaws emerged from an effort to improve the feel of its cars.
As the company began developing new small cars in the late 1990s, it listened to customers who complained about ‘‘cheap-feeling’’ switches that required too much effort to turn. GM set about making switches that would work more smoothly and give drivers the impression that they were better designed, a GM switch engineer testified in a lawsuit deposition in the spring of 2013.
The switches, though, were too loose, touching off events that led to at least 13 deaths, more than 50 crashes, and a raft of legal trouble for the Detroit automaker.
Former US attorney Anton Valukas, hired by GM in March to investigate the switch problems, told a congressional subcommittee last month that GM wanted each small-car ignition to ‘‘feel like it was a European sports car or something.’’ After years of lagging behind the Japanese, GM was eager to make better, more competitive small cars.
But as it turned out, the new switches in models such as the Chevrolet Cobalt and Saturn Ion can unexpectedly slip from ‘‘run’’ to ‘‘accessory,’’ causing engines to stall. That shuts off the power steering, making cars harder to control, and disables air bags in crashes. Some members of Congress put the death toll from the faulty switches near 100.
The problem led GM to recall 2.6 million small cars in February, forcing the carmaker to admit it knew about the switch troubles for more than a decade before taking action. The flaw has touched off federal investigations and prodded GM to review other safety issues, leading to 54 recalls this year covering 29 million vehicles.
The Associated Press traced the history of the problem using Valukas’s report as well as a deposition of switch engineer Ray DeGiorgio that was released by a House subcommittee.
In a wrongful death case in Georgia, DeGiorgio testified that he started out trying to make the switches easier to turn. But from the beginning he was consumed by electrical issues in the switch, not its mechanical parts.
When the switch supplier, Delphi, pointed out tests showing the switches turned too easily, DeGiorgio told Delphi not to change them because he was concerned mechanical alterations would harm the switch’s electrical performance, according to Valukas.
Delphi spokeswoman Claudia Tapia said the company isn’t commenting on the details of GM’s recall.
In the end, DeGiorgio approved switches that were far below GM’s specifications for the force required to turn them. The result was a smooth-turning key, but also one that could slip out of position. Several years later, DeGiorgio signed off on a design change that fixed the problem, but he didn’t change the part number, which stymied later attempts to figure out what was wrong with the cars.
Repeated efforts to reach DeGiorgio have been unsuccessful. He was one of 15 employees dismissed by the company last month due to the recalls. At a House subcommittee hearing last month, GM chief executive Mary Barra didn’t mince words when lawmakers asked her about DeGiorgio’s statements to Valukas and congressional investigators.
‘‘I don’t find Mr. DeGiorgio credible,’’ Barra said.
GM spokesman Greg Martin said Valukas’s report cites several opportunities that the company missed to fix the problem before the switches went into production. ‘‘It should never have happened regardless of what the reasons for changing the initial specifications for the switches were,’’ he said.
Subsequent safety reviews also found ignition switch troubles in other cars. The company has issued five recalls for 17.1 million cars with switch problems this year.
Among the recalls are 3.4 million large cars including the Chevrolet Impala, which had switches DeGiorgio worked on. GM says the combined force of a large bump and a swinging key chain can cause those switches to slip and stall the engine. GM is changing the key hole from a slot to a small circle to limit how much key chains can swing and tug on the ignition.