fb-pixel Skip to main content

With 2016 decision ahead, Hillary Clinton turns to liberal base

Hillary Rodham Clinton’s recent statements suggest a concerted effort by Clinton to appeal to the Democratic Party’s most activist, liberal voters.Elise Amendola/AP/File

WASHINGTON — Hillary Rodham Clinton is working hard to shore up support among liberals in hopes of tamping down a serious challenge from the left in the battle for the 2016 Democratic nomination.

Clinton has aligned herself firmly with President Obama since the November midterms on a range of liberal-friendly issues, including immigration, climate change, and opening diplomatic relations with Cuba.

In an impassioned human rights speech this month, she also condemned the CIA’s use of harsh interrogation tactics and decried cases of apparent police brutality against minorities.

The recent statements suggest a concerted effort by Clinton to appeal to the Democratic Party’s most activist, liberal voters, who have often eyed her with suspicion and who would be crucial to her securing the party’s nomination.

But the positions also tie her ever more tightly to a president who remains broadly unpopular, and could provide new lines of attack for the many Republicans jostling to oppose her if she runs.

Clinton has said she is considering a second run for president and would probably reach her decision after Jan. 1. An announcement looks likely in the spring.

There are several potential Democratic candidates who could appeal to portions of the party’s liberal base, including former senator Jim Webb of Virginia, Governor Martin O’Malley of Maryland, and Senator Bernard Sanders, a Vermont independent. Many progressives also are urging a bid by Senator Elizabeth Warren, Democrat of Massachusetts, whose populist anti-Wall Street message draws large crowds.

In the meantime, Clinton has been quietly meeting with potential campaign advisers and consulting a variety of people, from business leaders to sitting Democratic political figures, about issues she might address in a campaign.

She also has been making a point of addressing topical matters at speaking events and other appearances. The former secretary of state’s office has released statements in her name in support of Obama’s announcement of executive action on immigration and on the planned normalization of relations with Cuba.

Her appeals to liberals were on clear display last week at a gala award ceremony in New York named for Robert F. Kennedy, who was assassinated in 1968 during his idealistic run for the White House.

Clinton said she is proud to have been part of an administration that ended extrajudicial transfers and abusive treatment of terrorism detainees. The practices were the subject of an exhaustive Senate report this month that concluded that the CIA had engaged in torture and that the methods were ineffective in gaining useful intelligence.

The well-dressed crowd in a Manhattan hotel ballroom on Dec. 16 applauded loudly at that statement and thrilled to her broader theme of righting social wrongs.

‘‘What would Robert Kennedy say about the fact that still, today, more than 16 million children live in poverty in the richest nation on earth?’’ Clinton asked.

‘‘What would he say about the fact that such a large portion of economic gains have gone to such a small portion of our population,’’ she continued, also asking about the persistent wealth gap among blacks and Hispanics and the unequal treatment of black men in the criminal justice system.

‘‘What would Robert Kennedy say to the thousands of Americans marching in our streets demanding justice for all? To the young people with their eyes open and their hands up?’’

The remarks were more in keeping with Clinton’s early career as a lawyer and human rights champion than her later work as a politically moderate senator, failed presidential candidate, or diplomat.

They also appear designed to address a populist hunger among many Democrats for a candidate attuned to economic inequality and the concerns of working people, including many who would prefer a run by Warren.

On the environment, many activists are annoyed by Clinton’s refusal to take a stand on the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, which requires approval from the State Department, which she used to lead. She sidestepped that issue again at another New York gala this month but gave an enthusiastic endorsement of Obama’s recent actions on climate change.