Next Score View the next score

    US vs. European hurricane model: Which is better?

    ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — When forecasters from the ­National Weather Service track a hurricane, they use models from several different supercomputers around the world to create their predictions.

    Some of those models are more accurate. During Hurricane Sandy last October, for instance, the model from the European Center for Medium-range Weather Forecasting in the United Kingdom predicted eight days before landfall that the large storm would hit the East Coast, while the American supercomputer model showed Sandy drifting out to sea.

    The American model eventually predicted Sandy’s landfall four days before the storm hit — plenty of time for preparation — but revealed a potential weakness in the American computer compared with the European system. It left some meteorologists fuming.


    “Let me be blunt: the state of operational US numerical weather prediction is an embarrassment to the nation and it does not have to be this way,” Cliff Maas, a professor of atmospheric sciences at the University of Washington, wrote.

    Get Today's Headlines in your inbox:
    The day's top stories delivered every morning.
    Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

    Meteorologists agree that the two US supercomputers that provide storm models are underpowered — which is why the National Weather Service plans to upgrade those computers in the next two years. The two main forecasting computers — one in Orlando and the other in Reston, Va., — will receive $25 million in upgrades as part of the Hurricane Sandy supplemental bill that was recently approved by Congress.

    “This will improve weather forecasting across the board,” said Christopher Vaccaro, a spokesman for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. “Certainly one area of concern that has received some attention were these larger high-impact extreme weather events. The European model is able to pick up on those storms earlier than our model.”

    Jeff Masters, meteorology director at the online forecasting service Weather Underground, said that other than Hurricane Sandy, the US model outperformed the European model during the 2012 hurricane season — but if you look at a three-year period, the European model still comes out on top.

    “If the US did invest more money and people into making the model better, then the forecast would be better,” Masters said. “The money we spend on weather forecasts and improving them pays for itself.”


    Still, with hurricane season starting Saturday, forecasters say the average person living in a coastal area shouldn’t worry about the capability gap between the computers.

    “I really could care less which is the better model because we have access to them both,” said James Franklin, branch chief of the hurricane specialist unit.

    And forecasters say that hurricane modeling and forecasting has become more accurate overall in the last 10 years.

    Forecasters at the National Hurricane Center in Miami use both American and European models — and other models — then average them for a storm’s projected path. The computers take data from weather satellites, observations, and weather balloons, then plug the data into complex algorithms.

    The fact that the American supercomputer is lacking in processing power does need to be addressed. In the long run, improving its computing power will increase the overall quality of data for scientists drawing from multiple sources.


    “You want to have the best information possible when you’re trying to decide what to do,” Masters said. “Having better forecast models is going to improve your chances.”

    Specialists also say the quality of a nation’s computer capability is emblematic of its commitment to research, science, and innovation.