You can now read 10 articles in a month for free on BostonGlobe.com. Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.

The Boston Globe

World

Patriots Live

6

10

3rd Qtr 9:39 1st & 10, Own 20

Red Sox Live

1

0

▲  4th Inning 1 outs

Russia opposes use of force in Syria resolution

May reconsider if terms of deal are not fulfilled

“The report exposes the regime . . . . we consider that the report proves the responsibility of the regime for the chemical weapons attack of Aug. 21,” said Laurent Fabius, the foreign minister of France.

A. Nemenov/AFP/Getty Images

“The report exposes the regime . . . . we consider that the report proves the responsibility of the regime for the chemical weapons attack of Aug. 21,” said Laurent Fabius, the foreign minister of France.

DAMASCUS — Russia insisted Tuesday that a UN Security Council resolution governing Syria’s handling of its chemical weapons not allow the use of force, but it suggested that could change if Damascus reneges on the deal to give up its stockpile.

The main Syrian opposition coalition, meanwhile, urged the international community to take swift action against the regime of President Bashar Assad in response to a UN finding that the nerve agent sarin was used in a deadly attack near the capital last month.

Continue reading below

Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov of Russia said his country ‘‘spoke clearly’’ about rejecting the use of force when the chemical weapons agreement was worked out Saturday in Geneva between Washington and Moscow. The plan calls for an inventory of Syria’s chemical weapons within a week, with all components of the program out of the country or destroyed by mid-2014.

But if signs emerge that Syria is not fulfilling the agreement or there are reports of further chemical weapons use, ‘‘then the Security Council will examine the situation,’’ Lavrov said, suggesting the issue could be reconsidered.

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said a resolution on the US-Russia deal must be enforceable, saying that the ‘‘most effective’’ way is under Chapter 7 of the UN charter. That deals with threats to international peace and security and has provisions for enforcement by military or nonmilitary means, such as sanctions.

While in principle all Security Council resolutions are legally binding, Ban said, ‘‘in reality, we need clear guidelines under Chapter 7.’’

Lavrov made his remarks at a news conference in Moscow with Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius of France. France and the United States say a military option remained on the table, and they are pushing for the UN resolution to reflect that.

Diplomats said the five permanent council members — the United States, Russia, China, Britain, and France — made little progress Tuesday on a draft resolution and would meet again Wednesday.

On Monday, UN inspectors submitted a report on the Aug. 21 chemical weapons attack near Damascus that deepened the Syrian crisis. It was the first official confirmation by impartial experts that chemical weapons were used in the attack, which killed hundreds.

The report confirmed that chemical weapons were used but did not ascribe blame, and Lavrov and Fabius differed on their interpretations.

‘‘The report exposes the regime,’’ Fabius said. ‘‘On the basis of the information of our external agents, we consider that the report proves the responsibility of the regime for the chemical weapons attack of Aug. 21.’’

The United States, Britain, and France said evidence in the report — the type of rockets, the composition of the sarin agent, and trajectory of the missiles — showed that Assad’s government was responsible. The report said surface-to-surface rockets containing sarin were fired from an area where Syria’s military has bases, but said the evidence could have been manipulated in the rebel-controlled neighborhood that was hit.Russia, an ally of the Syrian regime, disagreed with the West’s conclusions. Lavrov said Moscow has ‘‘serious reason to suggest this was a provocation’’ by the rebels.

Ban called the report ‘‘the most significant confirmed use of chemical weapons against civilians since Saddam Hussein used them’’ against Kurds in Halabja, Iraq, in 1988.

The main Syrian opposition group, the Western-backed Syrian National Coalition, said the report clearly shows that only the Syrian regime could have carried out the attack, and it urged the United Nations to refer Syria to the International Criminal Court.

‘‘The Syrian coalition urges the Security Council to end the culture of impunity in Syria and to stop the Syrian regime from carrying out further war crimes and crimes against humanity,’’ the coalition said.

Ahmad al-Jarba, coalition president, said the UN resolution should force the destruction of Syria’s chemical weapons and also stop ‘‘the regime’s war machine by banning the use of its air force, missiles, and artillery.’’

The Syrian Foreign Ministry slammed the United States, Britain, and France for demanding Assad step down, denouncing ‘‘their frantic quest to impose their will’’ on Syria.

‘‘Assad is the legitimate president chosen by the Syrian people and will remain so as long as the Syrian people want this,’’ the statement said.

Ban told the UN General Assembly on Tuesday afternoon that the executive council overseeing the Chemical Weapons Convention will meet Friday in The Hague to endorse the US-Russia agreement. The Security Council is then expected to adopt a resolution early next week, he said.

Loading comments...

You have reached the limit of 10 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week