Opinion

OP/EXTRA | ALAN WIRZBICKI

Cambridge vs. Uber: Innovation hub protects taxis, hurts own reputation

Car-hailing smartphone app Uber is under fire in Cambridge, where the city is seeking tough regulations on the company.

Jack Atley/The New York Times

Car-hailing smartphone app Uber is under fire in Cambridge, where the city is seeking tough regulations on the company.

What’s more important to Cambridge: keeping its status as an innovation hub, or protecting the entrenched taxi industry? That’s what’s at stake in the city’s silly crusade to shut down the car-hailing app Uber, which is in Cambridge’s crosshairs again. After the city’s last effort to ban the car service failed in 2012, the Cambridge licensing board is set to consider rules tonight that would effectively chase Uber out of town. What message would that send? In the very industries the city strives to cultivate, banning Uber would turn Cambridge into a laughingstock.

The meeting tonight comes as cab drivers and taxi companies have launched increasingly desperate attacks on Uber, which has spread to 128 cities in 37 countries since its 2009 launch in San Francisco. The app lets users summon a car with a smartphone and then determines fares using GPS. Uber can’t pick up street hails, but the competitive advantage that privilege once provided taxis has eroded, since so many customers now carry smartphones. Cab drivers can pick up street hails, but must charge fares regulated by the city. The trade-off was worth it when street hails were the most practical way to summon a cab, and strict controls on the number of medallions meant taxis were protected from competition.

Advertisement

That turned taxi medallions into cash cows — and also left the taxi industry woefully unprepared when Uber appeared on the scene. Cab companies haven’t been able to upgrade their own service to offer Uber-like convenience, so now they’re looking for regulators to snuff out the competition for them. But a city that prides itself on fostering innovation, as Cambridge does, should be pressuring taxi companies to give riders what they want, rather than forcing riders to just accept what the taxis are offering.

More coverage:

The podium: Uber vs. taxis

Get Arguable with Jeff Jacoby in your inbox:
Our conservative columnist offers a weekly take on everything from politics to pet peeves.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

Editorial: Taxi drivers should fight Uber with service, not smears

European taxi drivers protest Uber

Opinion: In taxis’ battle with Uber, ugly endgame looms

Alan Wirzbicki can be reached at awirzbicki@globe.com.
Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com