fb-pixel Skip to main content

An Iranian threat, 3 vans and a phone call: behind the mystery at a UK air base

Armed police maintained road blocks and security checks around RAF Fairford on Sept. 28 in Fairford, England. Leon Neal/Getty

LONDON -- The three white vans navigated through a picturesque stretch of rural England in the middle of the night, winding toward a British air base that America is using to wage war on Iran.

It was 12:45 a.m. last Sunday when one of the men inside the vans -- for reasons still not clear -- dialed emergency services, giving authorities their first sign that a terrorism plot they had received intelligence on almost two weeks earlier might be in motion.

Police scrambled an urgent, armed response, speeding to the scene and arresting the man and four associates. A grainy photo later leaked to the media showed the five men sitting shirtless on the side of a road, their hands bound behind their backs.

Why the man called police remains the subject of debate among investigators trying to unravel what happened that night, security officials from several countries told The New York Times. They asked for anonymity because the inquiry remains open.

It is one of many puzzles that authorities have yet to piece together.

The call did set off a cascade of events, including the arrest of the men on suspicion of terrorism, the frantic evacuation of 85 homes, a bomb disposal robot searching the vans for explosives, and a national security meeting convened by Prime Minister Andy Burnham. He said later that there were “strong indications that Iran played a part.”

But a part in what, exactly? Burnham and other British authorities have offered few answers. The vans contained no explosives when police searched them. And within a day, all five men were released on bail, the kind of treatment typically given to common criminals, rather than terrorism suspects. Authorities could also have been hamstrung by the need to keep evidence classified and thus unable to be cited in criminal court.

Police have cast a wide net in trying to find those responsible for hiring the men, whom one official described as “unwitting chumps.” U.S. and British officials believe the operation is connected to Iran’s Revolutionary Guard or a separate military headquarters in Tehran, Iran’s capital. Abbas Araghchi, Iran’s foreign minister, has rejected the accusations.

This account is drawn from interviews with investigators, local officials and residents as well as security officials in Britain, Germany, Israel and the United States who had knowledge of warnings about a plot to target U.S. bases in Britain and Europe. Some officials declined to reveal details of the case. Others conceded that the full story remains hazy, even to them. Most spoke on the condition of anonymity, citing the sensitive nature of the investigation.

For Britain, the events of the past six days have been a vivid -- if at times mystifying -- reminder that the U.S.- and Israeli-led war against Iran that began eight months ago has the potential to do more than raise the price of oil.

In July, Iran’s Revolutionary Guard issued a statement warning that allowing the United States to use the base “makes London responsible” for their actions. “Any base used to launch attacks on Iranian territory,” the statement said, “is a legitimate target for our forces.”

In the end, officials found no concrete signs the men in the vans were in the final stages of an attack. But for a while last Sunday, it looked like Iran might be preparing to make good on its threat.

In mid-September, U.S. military commanders received a chilling warning from U.S. and other Western intelligence agencies, according to U.S. officials briefed on the information. Royal Air Force Fairford, the base in southern England primarily used by the U.S. Air Force to deploy some of its largest bombers, was the target of a potential Iran-backed attack.

The murky outlines of a plot had been pieced together through a combination of intercepted communications, informants and other intelligence. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said his intelligence officials also warned their British counterparts of a likely Iranian-sponsored attack, though they did not provide a specific target. Follow-up attacks were likely to include drones, the confidential assessments warned.

The warnings were general. Analysts could not pin down a date or concrete details about the plotters, other than concluding they were guided and supported by Tehran. Base commanders in Britain raised security levels, already elevated since the start of the war with Iran.

Residents of the nearby town of Fairford, and the villages of Kempsford and Whelford, began noticing changes. There were “rumbles that things were being moved around the base in terms of protection and levels of warnings,” said Dom Morris, a local councilor.

Across Europe, concern among officials was surging. According to a senior U.S. official, Israel warned Germany that U.S. bases there were at heightened risk, noting Spangdahlem and Ramstein in particular.

On Sept. 23, four days before the events at RAF Fairford, an Iranian-backed media site posted comments from Yahya Rahim Safavi, former chief commander of the Revolutionary Guard. According to SITE Intelligence Group, which tracks the online activity of jihadi organizations, Safavi condemned Europe as a “logistics hub” for America’s war on Iran, naming air bases that U.S. forces have used to conduct the war, including Ramstein in Germany, Aviano in Italy and Fairford.

But without concrete intelligence about a specific target or timing, there was little authorities could do -- except tighten security and wait.

That changed, dramatically, last Sunday.

A local farmer returning home from a party found her driveway blocked by the three white vans.

“I looked at it and thought ‘that is not real’,” the farmer, who declined to be identified, later told BBC News. She told reporters she saw eight to 10 people in masks running.

At 1:36 a.m., she said, she called 999, the British version of 911, and later said she believed her call “foiled whatever plans they had.”

The police timeline suggests, however, that she made her call about 50 minutes after the man in the van. It isn’t clear whether the people she saw were the suspects, or security operatives responding to the initial alert.

“This is a hugely complex and large-scale operation,” Vicki Evans, the deputy assistant commissioner for Britain’s counter terrorism police, said later last Sunday, adding: “Our activity is in the interest of national security.”

By Monday, however, the case took a surprising turn.

The men were released on bail, a rare outcome for terrorism suspects. Police said later they had discovered some gasoline, but no explosives, in the vans. Laurence Taylor, Evans’ supervisor, told reporters the men were “subject to stringent conditions on their movement and contact with others. They absolutely remain under investigation.”

ls believed the initial call by one of the five men was part of a plan to distract police while a broader plot unfolded. Others thought it was more likely that the five men were low-level criminals, one of whom called when they realized they had been hired to do something serious.

Taylor shared little about the investigation in his statement Monday. But he hinted at the complexity of the case.

“Often this threat becomes visible to us as criminal activity,” he said, “often at a small scale and committed by individuals whose primary aim is not terrorism but a quick financial gain.”

The head of MI5, Britain’s domestic security agency, has warned for years about Iran-backed plots, which have often involved targeting opponents using local criminals.

“Iranian state actors make extensive use of criminals as proxies -- from international drug traffickers to low-level crooks,” Ken McCallum, the group’s director general, said in 2024. Iranian journalists and dissidents in Britain have received death threats and been physically attacked.

When he was prime minister of Britain, Keir Starmer initially refused to let the Trump administration use RAF Fairford for strikes on Iran, saying he would not join “regime change from the skies.” But he later gave permission for what he called “defensive” operations, and U.S. B-52 and B-1 planes loaded with bombs began flying to Iran from Fairford. Burnham has continued the policy.

An actual assault on a U.S. air base in Britain would be a drastic escalation, officials said.

By the end of the week, the evacuated families had returned to their homes and a 1,300-foot cordon around where the vans had been was taken down. But concrete barriers were installed around the entrance of RAF Fairford. As the investigation continued, the police arrested a 25-year-old dual British-Iranian citizen in London, on suspicion of preparing terrorist acts. He, too, was released on bail.

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.