Opinion

SCOT LEHIGH

Don’t mess with Maura Healey, Texas

Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, center, takes questions from reporters as Martin Meehan, president of the University of Massachusetts, left, looks on during a news conference Tuesday, Jan. 31, 2017, in Boston. Healey is joining a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts challenging President Donald Trump's executive order on immigration. (AP Photo/Steven Senne)
Steven Senne/AP Photo
Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey has not been shy about taking on Exxon Mobil — or Texas congressman Lamar Smith.

Decades ago, we had the so-called Austin-Boston connection, a symbiotic relationship between Texas and Massachusetts political figures such as Lloyd Bentsen and Mike Dukakis, Lyndon Johnson and John F. Kennedy, and Sam Rayburn and John McCormack.

These days, we have the Boston-Austin Disaffection, featuring liberal climate-crusading Attorney General Maura Healey of Boston, determined investigator of Exxon Mobil, and science-doubting US Representative Lamar Smith of San Antonio, conservative avenging-angel ally of the fossil fuel industry.

Healey, a shrewd, camera-ready activist AG, is using her consumer-protection authority to open a new front in the informational battle against global warming — and perhaps even to leverage tobacco-settlement-type payments from the oil industry giant.

Advertisement

Smith, a voracious gobbler of fossil-fuel campaign cash and a the-science-isn’t-certain climate-change skeptic, is employing his position as chairman of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology to run interference for Texas-headquartered Exxon Mobil.

Get Today in Opinion in your inbox:
Globe Opinion's must-reads, delivered to you every Sunday-Friday.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

Our story began when Healey and New York AG Eric Schneiderman commenced investigations into whether Exxon Mobil had sown confusion about the causes of climate change long after its own scientific experts had concluded that carbon emission from fossil fuels played a major role. Exxon Mobil now acknowledges the climate-science consensus and at least nominally supports a carbon tax. But credible reports have arisen that despite its internal conclusions, the energy leviathan spent decades trying to muddy the public debate, partly through misleading statements, partly by funding climate-science-denying conservative groups.

Saying things one knows or suspects aren’t true isn’t a crime. Which is where the notion of consumer protection comes in. Healey might have legal traction for action against the corporate goliath if she could establish that, by suppressing information about the CO2-climate-change connection, the company effectively deceived investors who bought its stock. Or failed to apprise consumers about the real impact of its petroleum products.

Enter, stage right, congressman Smith. When Healey started subpoenaing documents from Exxon Mobil that could shed light on a corporate cover-up, Smith began subpoenaing information from her and Schneiderman, demanding internal communications and other documents that might shed light on the motivation for their investigation, which he contends violates Exxon Mobil’s First Amendment rights and could chill scientific research.

That’s a tactic the Texas science skeptic — and Cape Cod vacationer and tony Wianno Club member — has regularly employed in his chosen political role riding shotgun for the fossil-fuel industry. So much so that, last year, the San Antonio Express-News, long a supporter, declined to endorse him. “A particular issue is his abuse of his position as chairman of the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee,” its editorial said. “Specifically, it is his bullying on the issue of climate change that should concern all Americans.”

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Exxon Mobil has sued to block Healey in federal court in Texas and in state court here, making discovery demands similar to Smith’s. But Healey is on a roll. In December, she stared down the Texas judge overseeing Exxon Mobil’s suit, who had ordered her to saddle up and gallop to Texas to be deposed. When he refused to reconsider, she asked the relevant appeals court to stay his hand. His bluff called, the judge folded his cards and canceled the order. Meanwhile, a Massachusetts superior court judge recently ruled that Exxon Mobil must provide the documents Healey wants.

And now she and Schneiderman have told Smith that they won’t comply with his latest flurry of subpoenas, saying he has no authority over her office or its work.

In an interview, Healey had a blunt message for Smith: “Find something more productive to do. I am in the position of standing up for people and investors. Lamar Smith and his committee are in the position of standing up for Big Oil.”

As for Smith, whose office didn’t reply to a request for an interview? The next move is his. Does he back down or escalate, perhaps by trying to have Healey declared in contempt of Congress — but at the very real risk of looking like he’s all hat and no cattle?

No sign yet, but here’s my bet: Lone Star Lamar has met his match in the Maura the Kid.

Scot Lehigh can be reached at lehigh@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @GlobeScotLehigh.